Any person who intentionally does any of the following is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor:
Has or offers to have or requests to have nonmarital sexual intercourse for anything of value.
Commits or offers to commit or requests to commit an act of sexual gratification, in public or in private, involving the sex organ of one person and the mouth or anus of another for anything of value.
Masturbates a person or offers to masturbate a person or requests to be masturbated by a person for anything of value.
Commits or offers to commit or requests to commit an act of sexual contact for anything of value.
If the person under sub. (1m)
has not attained the age of 18 years and if the court determines that the best interests of the person are served and society will not be harmed, the court may enter a consent decree under s. 938.32
or a deferred prosecution agreement in accordance with s. 938.245
, or 971.40
In order for a female prostitute to avoid prosecution upon equal protection grounds, it must be shown that the failure to prosecute male patrons was selective, persistent, discriminatory, and without justifiable prosecutorial discretion. State v. Johnson, 74 Wis. 2d 169
, 246 N.W.2d 503
Prosecuting for solicitation under s. 939.30, rather than for prostitution under this section, did not deny equal protection. Sears v. State, 94 Wis. 2d 128
, 287 N.W.2d 785
A prostitution raid focusing only on female participants amounts to selective prosecution in violation of equal protection. The applicable constitutional analysis is discussed. State v. McCollum, 159 Wis. 2d 184
, 464 N.W.2d 44
(Ct. App. 1990).
As long as someone compensates another for engaging in nonmarital sex, the elements of prostitution are met. The person making payment need not engage in the sexual act. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245
, 603 N.W.2d 732
Since sub. (1) [now sub. (1m) (a)] requires a request for nonmarital sexual intercourse be coupled with the offer of anything of value, evidence that the defendant was willing to pay to watch the witness masturbate did not satisfy sub. (1). State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222
, 305 Wis. 2d 722
, 741 N.W.2d 488
Except as provided in s. 948.081
, any person who enters or remains in any place of prostitution with intent to have nonmarital sexual intercourse or to commit an act of sexual gratification, in public or in private, involving the sex organ of one person and the mouth or anus of another, masturbation or sexual contact with a prostitute is guilty of the following:
For a first or 2nd violation, a Class A misdemeanor.
For a 3rd or subsequent violation, a Class I felony.
Except as provided under s. 948.08
, whoever intentionally solicits or causes any person to practice prostitution or establishes any person in a place of prostitution is guilty of a Class H felony.
Section 944.32, 1985 stats., prohibiting solicitation of prostitutes, does not violate right of free speech. Shillcutt v. State, 74 Wis. 2d 642
, 247 N.W.2d 694
This section is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad and its penalty is not disproportionate. State v. Johnson, 108 Wis. 2d 703
, 324 N.W.2d 447
(Ct. App. 1982).
Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor:
Solicits another to have nonmarital sexual intercourse or to commit an act of sexual gratification, in public or in private, involving the sex organ of one person and the mouth or anus of another, masturbation or sexual contact with a person the solicitor knows is a prostitute; or
With intent to facilitate another in having nonmarital intercourse or committing an act of sexual gratification, in public or in private, involving the sex organ of one person and the mouth or anus of another, masturbation or sexual contact with a prostitute, directs or transports the person to a prostitute or directs or transports a prostitute to the person.
Keeping place of prostitution.
Whoever intentionally does any of the following is guilty of a Class H felony:
Keeps a place of prostitution; or
Grants the use or allows the continued use of a place as a place of prostitution.
History: 1977 c. 173
; 2001 a. 109
A conviction under sub. (2) requires proof that the defendant has authority to exclude those engaging in prostitution from the use of the place for prohibited acts. Shillcutt v. State, 74 Wis. 2d 642
, 247 N.W.2d 694
Under sub. (2), “grants the use" requires the prosecution to prove a single affirmative approval of the use of the premises as a place of prostitution, while “allows the continued use of" requires proof of intentional but passive acquiescence or toleration of the use on more than one occasion. Johnson v. State, 76 Wis. 2d 672
, 251 N.W.2d 834
Solicitation of drinks prohibited.
Any licensee, permittee or bartender of a retail alcohol beverage establishment covered by a license or permit issued under ch. 125
who permits an entertainer or employee to solicit a drink of any alcohol beverage, as defined in s. 125.02 (1)
, or any other drink from a customer on the premises, or any entertainer or employee who solicits such drinks from any customer, is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor.
History: 1975 c. 39
; 1975 c. 199
; Stats. 1975 s. 944.36; 1977 c. 173
; 1981 c. 79
Legislative Council Note, 1981: The amendment to s. 944.36 reflects the combining of s. 66.054 and ch. 176 into one chapter, ch. 125, and the definition of “alcohol beverage" in that chapter. [Bill 300-A]