Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 602
Relating to: contracts providing for the confinement of prisoners of this state in another state.
Read a second time.
Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 602 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 602?
Senator Chvala moved that Senate Bill 602 be referred to the joint committee on Finance.
__________________
2:52 P.M.
Senator Lasee in the chair.
S694
The question was: Shall
Senate Bill 602 be referred to the joint committee on
Finance?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 14; noes, 19; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 14.
Noes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 19.
Absent or not voting - None.
Refused to refer to the joint committee on Finance.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 602?
Senator Zien moved rejection of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 602.
The question was: Rejection of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 602?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 23; noes, 10; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 23.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, George, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Risser and Wineke - 10.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 602?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 602 offered by Senator Jauch.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 602?
Senator Zien moved rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 602.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 602?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 602 offered by Senator Moore.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 602?
POINT OF ORDER
Senator Zien raised the point of order that Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 602 is not germane.
The Chair ruled the point well taken.
Senator Wineke appealed the ruling of the Chair.
The question was: Shall the decision of the Chair stand as the judgement of the Senate?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Decision of the Chair stands as the judgement of the Senate.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 602
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 24; noes, 9; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Moen, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 24.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, George, Jauch, Moore, Risser and Wineke - 9.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged tot he Assembly.
Senate Bill 622
Relating to: renumbering and reorganizing the environmental statutes.
Read a second time.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 622
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 270
Relating to: creating a new standard of dangerousness for involuntary civil commitments and emergency detentions, requiring review by the attorney general or his or her designee of certain proposed emergency detentions, emergency detentions, proposed involuntary civil commitments and involuntary civil commitments and requiring preparation and submittal of certain reports.
Read.
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270?
Senator Darling, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill
188.
__________________
4:32 P.M.
Senator Drzewiecki in the chair.
__________________
4:34 P.M.
Senator Lasee in the chair.
S695
Senator Panzer moved that Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 15; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Burke, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 18.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 15.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 4 to Senate Bill 270 be concurred in?