Relating to: creating a new standard of dangerousness for involuntary civil commitments and emergency detentions, requiring review by the attorney general or his or her designee of certain proposed emergency detentions, emergency detentions, proposed involuntary civil commitments and involuntary civil commitments and requiring preparation and submittal of certain reports.
Read.
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270?
Senator Darling, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 188.
__________________
in the chair
4:32 P.M.
Senator Drzewiecki in the chair.
__________________
in the chair
4:34 P.M.
Senator Lasee in the chair.
S695 Senator Panzer moved that Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 15; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Burke, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 18.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 15.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 270 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 4 to Senate Bill 270 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 5 to Senate Bill 270 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Assembly Bill 441
Relating to: expanding requirements for a woman's informed consent for performance or inducement of an abortion and for consent to a minor's obtaining an abortion and providing a penalty.
Read
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 offered by Senators Huelsman and Rosenzweig.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441?
Senator Huelsman moved nonconcurrence in Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 be nonconcurred in?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 17; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Decker, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Risser, Rosenzweig, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Noes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, A. Lasee, Petak, C. Potter, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Absent or not voting - None.
Nonconcurrence refused.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 5:34 P.M..
5:07 P.M.
__________________
RECESS
5:34 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
in the chair
5:34 P.M.
Senator Rude in the chair.
Senator Drzewiecki moved that Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, A. Lasee, Petak, C. Potter, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Decker, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Risser, Rosenzweig, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 offered by Senator Huelsman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441?
Senator Drzewiecki moved that Senate amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, A. Lasee, Petak, C. Potter, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Decker, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Risser, Rosenzweig, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 offered by Senator Huelsman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441?
Senator Drzewiecki moved that Senate amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, A. Lasee, Petak, C. Potter, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Decker, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Risser, Rosenzweig, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
S696 The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 441 be concurred in?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, A. Lasee, Petak, C. Potter, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Decker, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Risser, Rosenzweig, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Concurred in.
__________________
Second reading and amendments of Assembly Joint Resolutions and Assembly Bills
Assembly Bill 103
Relating to: specifying that developmental delay is a handicapping condition that may qualify certain children for special education.
Read a second time.
Senator Drzewiecki, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 103?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Weeden, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senator Moore, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 103.
Loading...
Loading...