Senator Zien moved rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Chvala, Moen and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Jauch, Andrea and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
S722
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
565 offered by Senator Jauch.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 11 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
Senate amendment 12 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Decker, A. Lasee and Welch.
Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators George, Moore and Burke.
Senate amendment 14 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Panzer.
Senate amendment 15 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
Senate amendment 16 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 11 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Wineke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 11 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate
Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Senator Wineke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 15 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate
Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Senator Wineke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 16 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate
Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 12 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 14 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Panzer, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 14 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate
Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
__________________
5:56 P.M.
Senator Rude in the chair.
Senator Weeden, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 565
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 21; noes, 12; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 21.
Noes - Senators Andrea, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser and Wineke - 12.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Senate Bill 615
Relating to: transferring the duty and authority to provide child welfare services in Milwaukee County from the Milwaukee County department of social services to the department of health and family services and making appropriations.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615 offered by Senator Darling.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615?
Senator Darling, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate
Bill 615 be withdrawn and returned to author.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615 offered by Senators Darling and Moore.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615 offered by Senators Moore, Darling, Burke, George, Farrow and Rosenzweig.
S723
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to
Senate Bill 615?
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
615 offered by Senator Darling.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615 offered by Senator Grobschmidt.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615?
Senator Darling moved that Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
615 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
615 be laid on the table?