8. INSURANCE PREMIUM FINANCE COMPANY LICENSES
Governor: Provide that the Division of Banking in the Department of Financial Institutions, rather than the Commissioner of Insurance, would have the authority to revoke or suspend the license of an insurance premium finance company under the conditions specified in the statutes.
Currently, the Division of Banking is responsible for issuing licenses for insurance finance premium companies and for enforcing all state regulations relating to insurance premium finance companies, except that the Commissioner of Insurance is authorized to revoke or suspend the license of such a company. This provision would make the Division responsible for revoking or suspending the license of an insurance premium finance company, under the conditions specified in the statutes, thereby maintaining consistency in the authority of the Division with respect to regulation of such companies.
[Bill Section: 2170]
9. INTEREST RATE ON HOME MORTGAGE ESCROW ACCOUNTS
Governor: Clarify that the Division of Banking (DOB) must report information to the Division of Savings and Loan [whose name would change to the Division of Savings Institutions (DSI) under the bill] to be used in calculating the interest rate that must be paid on residential mortgage escrow accounts. Under current law, DSI calculates the interest rate for escrow accounts based on information regarding interest rates paid on passbook accounts provided by the Office of Credit Unions (OCU) and the Division of Banking. However, the current statutes do not specifically require DOB to provide this information to DSI.
[Bill Section: 2167]
10. UNIVERSAL BANKING
Governor: Authorize the Division of Banking (DOB) within the Department of Financial Institutions to certify savings banks, saving and loan associations and state banks as "universal banks" under the procedures and with the powers outlined below. Provide that a universal bank would be one of the regulated entities under the powers of supervision and control of DOB. The provisions relating to universal banks would be created in a new chapter of the statutes, and could be cited as the "Wisconsin universal bank law" (UB Law).
General Provisions
Under current law, the Division of Savings and Loan [whose name would change to the Division of Savings Institutions (DSI) under the bill] regulates savings banks and savings and loan associations. DOB regulates state banks. The powers and regulation of these financial institutions are specified in the statutes and vary by type of institution. The UB Law would allow such financial institutions organized under state statutes to apply to DOB to be certified as a universal bank. Certification as a universal bank would provide expanded powers when compared to those currently held by the individual financial institutions. Financial institutions certified as universal banks would remain subject to existing requirements, duties and liabilities and would retain their powers as savings banks, savings and loan associations or state banks, except that, in the event of a conflict between the UB Law and such requirements, duties, liabilities or powers, the UB Law would control.
The Division of Banking would be required to administer the UB Law for all universal banks and to establish such fees as it determined were appropriate for documents filed with the Division and for services provided by the Division. DOB would also be authorized to promulgate rules to carry out the UB Law and to establish additional limits or requirements on universal banks if it determined that the limits or requirements were necessary for the protection of depositors, members, investors or the public.
Certification
A state-chartered savings bank, savings and loan association or bank would be allowed to apply to become certified as a universal bank by filing a written application with DOB including such information as the Division required and on such forms and in accordance with such procedures as DOB prescribed. DOB would be required to approve or disapprove the application in writing within 60 days after its submission to the Division. However, DOB and the financial institution could mutually agree to extend the application period for an additional 60 days.
DOB would be required to approve an application for certification as a universal bank if the applying financial institution met all of the following requirements:
a. It was chartered or organized, and regulated, as a savings bank, savings and loan association or state bank under Wisconsin statutes and had been in existence and continuous operation for a minimum of three years prior to the date of the application.
b. It was "well-capitalized" or "adequately capitalized" as defined by federal law related to banks and banking.
c. It did not exhibit a combination of financial, managerial, operational and compliance weaknesses that were moderately severe or unsatisfactory, as determined by the Division based upon the Division's assessment of the financial institution's capital adequacy, asset quality, management capability, earnings quantity and quality, adequacy of liquidity and sensitivity to market risk.
d. During the 12-month period prior to the application, it had not been the subject of an enforcement action and had no enforcement action pending against it by any state or federal financial institution regulatory agency, including DOB.
For any period during which a universal bank failed to meet such requirements, the Division would be authorized to order limits or restrictions to the exercise of the powers of the universal bank under the UB Law.
DOB would be required to issue to an applicant approved for certification as a universal bank a certificate of authority stating that the financial institution was so certified.
A financial institution certified as a universal bank would be authorized to terminate its certification upon 60 days' prior written notice to the Division and written approval of the Division. As a condition to the termination, the financial institution would be required to terminate its exercise of all powers granted under the UB Law prior to the termination of the certification. Written approval of the termination by DOB would be void if the financial institution failed to satisfy this precondition to termination.
Organization
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. A universal bank would continue to operate under its articles of incorporation and bylaws as in effect prior to certification as a universal bank or as such articles or bylaws were subsequently amended in accordance with the provisions of the statutes under which the universal bank was organized or chartered.
Name of a Universal Bank. Under current law and with certain exceptions, an institution organized as a state savings bank is required to adopt a name that identifies it as such and that includes the term "savings." With certain exceptions, an institution organized as a mutual savings and loan association or as a capital stock savings and loan association is required to include the words "savings and loan association" or "savings association" in its name. Such an institution is required to include the word "savings" in its name if its name includes the word "bank."
Subject to certain provisions on distinguishability and use of the same name, as described below, the UB Law would allow a state savings bank, state mutual savings and loan association or state capital stock savings and loan association that had been certified as a universal bank to use the word "bank" in its name, without having to include the word "savings." In addition, subject to the same provisions on distinguishability and use of the same name, the UB Law would specify that a universal bank organized as a savings and loan association that used the word "bank" in its name in accordance with the UB Law need not include the words "savings and loan association" or "savings association" in its name.
The UB Law would require that, with certain exceptions, the name of the universal bank be distinguishable upon the records of DOB from the following: (a) the name of any other financial institution organized under the laws of this state; and (b) the name of a national bank or foreign bank authorized to transact business in this state.
However, a universal bank would be allowed to apply to the Division for authority to use a name that did not meet such requirements as to a distinguishable name. DOB could authorize the use of the name if either of the following conditions were met: (a) the other bank consented to the use in writing and submitted an undertaking, in a form satisfactory to DOB, to change its name to a name that was distinguishable upon the records of the Division from the name of the applicant; or (b) the applicant delivered to DOB a certified copy of the final judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction establishing the applicant's right to use the name applied for in this state. Such exceptions to the distinguishable name requirements are consistent with current law for state banks.
In addition, a universal bank would be able to use a name that was used in this state by another financial institution, or by an institution authorized to transact business in this state, if the universal bank had done any of the following: (a) merged with the other institution; (b) been formed by reorganization of the other institution; or (c) acquired all or substantially all of the assets, including the name, of the other institution.
Capital Requirements
Current law provides differing requirements related to capital, net worth and capital stock for the various types of financial institutions. For a savings bank, the statutes specify that such an institution may be organized to exercise the powers conferred by the relevant statutes with minimum capital, surplus and reserves for operating expenses as determined by the Division of Savings Institutions. Additional specifications are made in such areas as evidence and maintenance of capital, dividends and the nature of capital stock, capital stock loans and retirement or reduction of capital stock.
The statutes on savings and loan associations provide that such institutions must maintain net worth at an amount not less than the minimum amount established by DSI and authorizes DSI to take appropriate action if an association fails to maintain the minimum net worth required.
Under current law, DOB determines the required capital of a state bank, subject to review by the Banking Review Board. The statutes also specify that a contingent fund and paid-in surplus each in an amount equal to at least 25% of the aggregate amount of the capital stock must be subscribed at the time the subscription list of shareholders is prepared by the incorporators.
Notwithstanding such provisions, the UB Law would authorize DOB to determine the minimum capital requirements of a savings bank, savings and loan association and state bank certified as a universal bank.
The UB Law would define capital for a universal bank organized as a stock organization as the sum of the following, less the amount of intangible assets that were not considered to be qualifying capital by a deposit insurance corporation or the Division: (a) capital stock; (b) preferred stock; (c) undivided profits; (d) surplus; (e) outstanding notes and debentures approved by DOB; (f) other forms of capital designated as capital by the Division; and (g) other forms of capital considered to be qualifying capital of the universal bank by a deposit insurance corporation. For a universal bank organized as a mutual organization, the same definition would apply except that net worth would be substituted for capital and preferred stock. "Deposit insurance corporation" would mean the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or other instrumentality of, or corporation chartered by, the United States that insures deposits of financial institutions and that is supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government as stated in a congressional resolution.
Under current law, a state savings bank is required to achieve and maintain status as an Internal Revenue Service qualified thrift lender. Such status requires meeting either the 60% asset test of the section of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) on domestic building and loan associations, or an asset test prescribed by rule of DSI that is not less than the percentage prescribed by such section of the IRC. The UB Law would specify that this requirement does not apply to universal banks.
Acquisitions, Mergers and Asset Purchases
The UB Law would authorize a universal bank, with the approval of DOB, to purchase the assets of, merge with, acquire or be acquired by any other financial institution, universal bank, national bank, federally chartered savings bank or savings and loan association, or by a holding company of any of these entities. An application for approval of such acquisitions, mergers and asset purchases would have to be submitted on a form prescribed by DOB and accompanied by a fee determined by the Division. Notwithstanding other provisions of state law, DSI approval would not be required for acquisitions or mergers involving a state savings bank or savings and loan association.
In processing and acting on applications for approval of acquisitions, mergers and asset purchases involving a universal bank, DOB would be required to apply the standards specified in the statutes governing the type of financial institution under which the universal bank had been organized or chartered.
Federal Financial Institution Powers.
Subject to the limitations outlined below, the UB Law would authorize universal banks to exercise all powers that may be exercised, directly or indirectly through a subsidiary, by a federally chartered savings bank, a federally chartered savings and loan association, a federally chartered national bank or by an affiliate of such an institution. A universal bank would be required to provide 60 days' prior written notice to DOB of the universal bank's intention to exercise a power under these provisions. The UB Law would specify that DOB could require that certain powers exercisable by universal banks be exercised through a subsidiary of the universal bank with appropriate safeguards to limit the risk exposure of the universal bank.
Loan Powers
General Provisions. The UB Law would permit a universal bank to make, sell, purchase, arrange, participate in, invest in or otherwise deal in loans or extensions of credit for any purpose. With the exceptions described below, the total liabilities of any person, other than a municipal corporation, to a universal bank for a loan or extension of credit could not exceed 20% of the capital of the universal bank at any time. In determining compliance with this restriction, liabilities of a partnership would include the liabilities of the general partners, computed individually as to each general partner on the basis of his or her direct liability.
However, the UB Law would provide that the percentage limitation described above would be 50% of the universal bank's capital if the borrower's debts were limited to certain types of liabilities. The first type includes a liability secured by warehouse receipts issued by warehouse keepers who are licensed and bonded under state law or under the federal Bonded Warehouse Act or who hold a registration certificate under Wisconsin law referred to as the Warehouse Keepers and Grain Dealers Security Act, if: (a) the receipts cover readily marketable nonperishable staples; (b) the staples are insured, if it is customary to insure the staples; and (c) the market value of the staples is not, at any time, less than 140% of the face amount of the obligation.
The second type of liability for which the percentage limitation described above would be 50% of the universal bank's capital is a liability in the form of a note or bond that met any of the following qualifications: (a) the note or bond is secured by not less than a like amount of bonds or notes of the United States issued since April 24, 1917, or certificates of indebtedness of the United States; (b) the note or bond is secured or covered by guarantees or by commitments or agreements to take over, or to purchase, the bonds or notes, and the guarantee, commitment or agreement was made by a federal reserve bank, the federal Small Business Administration, the federal Department of Defense or the federal Maritime Commission; or (c) the note or bond is secured by mortgages or trust deeds insured by the federal Housing Administration.
Local Governmental Units. The UB Law would specify that liabilities of a local governmental unit could not exceed 25% of a universal bank's capital. However, if the local governmental unit's liabilities were in the form of general obligations, the limit would be extended to 50%. If the liabilities included both revenue and general obligations, the limit would be 25% for the revenue obligations and a total of 50% for the combination of revenue and general obligations.
In addition, the total amount of temporary borrowings of any local governmental unit maturing within one year after the date of issue could not exceed 60% of the capital of the universal bank. Temporary borrowings and longer-term general obligation borrowings of a single local governmental unit could be considered separately in determining compliance with this provision.
Foreign National Government Bonds. A universal bank would be authorized to purchase general obligation bonds issued by any foreign national government if the bonds were payable in United States funds. The aggregate investment in these foreign bonds would not be permitted to exceed 3% of the capital of the universal bank, except that this limitation would not apply to bonds of the Canadian government and Canadian provinces that were payable in United States funds.
Other Foreign Bonds. The UB Law would authorize a universal bank to purchase bonds offered for sale by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Inter-American Development Bank or such other foreign bonds as were approved under rules established by DOB. The bill would specify that at no time could the aggregate investment in any of these bonds issued by a single issuer exceed 10% of the capital of the universal bank.
