19.59(6)
(6) Any county corporation counsel, attorney for a local governmental unit or statewide association of local governmental units may request the board to issue an opinion concerning the interpretation of this section. The board shall review such a request and may advise the person making the request.
19.59(7)
(7) Any person who violates
sub. (1) may be required to forfeit not more than $1,000 for each violation.
19.59(8)(a)(a) Subsection (1) shall be enforced in the name and on behalf of the state by action of the district attorney of any county wherein a violation may occur, upon the verified complaint of any person.
19.59(8)(b)
(b) In addition and supplementary to the remedy provided in
sub. (7), the district attorney may commence an action, separately or in conjunction with an action brought to obtain the remedy provided in
sub. (7), to obtain such other legal or equitable relief, including but not limited to mandamus, injunction or declaratory judgment, as may be appropriate under the circumstances.
19.59(8)(c)
(c) If the district attorney fails to commence an action to enforce
sub. (1) within 20 days after receiving a verified complaint or if the district attorney refuses to commence such an action, the person making the complaint may petition the attorney general to act upon the complaint. The attorney general may then bring an action under
par. (a) or
(b), or both.
19.59(8)(d)
(d) If the district attorney prevails in such an action, the court shall award any forfeiture recovered together with reasonable costs to the county wherein the violation occurs. If the attorney general prevails in such an action, the court shall award any forfeiture recovered together with reasonable costs to the state.
PERSONAL INFORMATION PRACTICES
19.62
19.62
Definitions. In this subchapter:
19.62(3)
(3) "Matching program" means the computerized comparison of information in one records series to information in another records series for use by an authority or a federal agency to establish or verify an individual's eligibility for any right, privilege or benefit or to recoup payments or delinquent debts under programs of an authority or federal agency.
19.62(5)
(5) "Personally identifiable information" means information that can be associated with a particular individual through one or more identifiers or other information or circumstances.
19.62(7)
(7) "Records series" means records that are arranged under a manual or automated filing system, or are kept together as a unit, because they relate to a particular subject, result from the same activity or have a particular form.
19.62(8)
(8) "State authority" means an authority that is a state elected official, agency, board, commission, committee, council, department or public body corporate and politic created by constitution, statute, rule or order; a state governmental or quasi-governmental corporation; a public purpose corporation, as defined in
s. 181.79 (1); the supreme court or court of appeals; the assembly or senate; or a nonprofit corporation operating the Olympic ice training center under
s. 42.11 (3).
19.65
19.65
Rules of conduct; employe training; and security. An authority shall do all of the following:
19.65(1)
(1) Develop rules of conduct for its employes who are involved in collecting, maintaining, using, providing access to, sharing or archiving personally identifiable information.
19.65(2)
(2) Ensure that the persons identified in
sub. (1) know their duties and responsibilities relating to protecting personal privacy, including applicable state and federal laws.
19.65 History
History: 1991 a. 39.
19.67
19.67
Data collection. 19.67(1)(1)
Collection from data subject or verification. An authority that maintains personally identifiable information that may result in an adverse determination about any individual's rights, benefits or privileges shall, to the greatest extent practicable, do at least one of the following:
19.67(1)(a)
(a) Collect the information directly from the individual.
19.67(1)(b)
(b) Verify the information, if collected from another person.
19.67 History
History: 1991 a. 39.
19.69
19.69
Computer matching. 19.69(1)(1)
Matching specification. A state authority may not use or allow the use of personally identifiable information maintained by the state authority in a match under a matching program, or provide personally identifiable information for use in a match under a matching program, unless the state authority has specified in writing all of the following for the matching program:
19.69(1)(a)
(a) The purpose and legal authority for the matching program.
19.69(1)(b)
(b) The justification for the program and the anticipated results, including an estimate of any savings.
19.69(1)(c)
(c) A description of the information that will be matched.
19.69(2)
(2) Copy to public records board. A state authority that prepares a written specification of a matching program under
sub. (1) shall provide to the public records board a copy of the specification and any subsequent revision of the specification within 30 days after the state authority prepares the specification or the revision.
19.69(3)(a)(a) Except as provided under
par. (b), a state authority may not take an adverse action against an individual as a result of information produced by a matching program until after the state authority has notified the individual, in writing, of the proposed action.
19.69(3)(b)
(b) A state authority may grant an exception to
par. (a) if it finds that the information in the records series is sufficiently reliable.
19.69 History
History: 1991 a. 39,
269;
1995 a. 27.
19.71
19.71
Sale of names or addresses. An authority may not sell or rent a record containing an individual's name or address of residence, unless specifically authorized by state law. The collection of fees under
s. 19.35 (3) is not a sale or rental under this section.
19.71 History
History: 1991 a. 39.
19.77
19.77
Summary of case law and attorney general opinions. Annually, the attorney general shall summarize case law and attorney general opinions relating to due process and other legal issues involving the collection, maintenance, use, provision of access to, sharing or archiving of personally identifiable information by authorities. The attorney general shall provide the summary, at no charge, to interested persons.
19.77 History
History: 1991 a. 39.
19.80(2)(2)
Employe discipline. Any person employed by an authority who violates this subchapter may be discharged or suspended without pay.
19.80(3)(a)(a) Any person who wilfully collects, discloses or maintains personally identifiable information in violation of federal or state law may be required to forfeit not more than $500 for each violation.
19.80(3)(b)
(b) Any person who wilfully requests or obtains personally identifiable information from an authority under false pretenses may be required to forfeit not more than $500 for each violation.
19.80 History
History: 1991 a. 39,
269.
OPEN MEETINGS OF GOVERNMENTAL BODIES
19.81
19.81
Declaration of policy. 19.81(1)
(1) In recognition of the fact that a representative government of the American type is dependent upon an informed electorate, it is declared to be the policy of this state that the public is entitled to the fullest and most complete information regarding the affairs of government as is compatible with the conduct of governmental business.
19.81(2)
(2) To implement and ensure the public policy herein expressed, all meetings of all state and local governmental bodies shall be publicly held in places reasonably accessible to members of the public and shall be open to all citizens at all times unless otherwise expressly provided by law.
19.81(3)
(3) In conformance with
article IV, section 10, of the constitution, which states that the doors of each house shall remain open, except when the public welfare requires secrecy, it is declared to be the intent of the legislature to comply to the fullest extent with this subchapter.
19.81(4)
(4) This subchapter shall be liberally construed to achieve the purposes set forth in this section, and the rule that penal statutes must be strictly construed shall be limited to the enforcement of forfeitures and shall not otherwise apply to actions brought under this subchapter or to interpretations thereof.
19.81 History
History: 1975 c. 426;
1983 a. 192.
19.81 Annotation
Subsequent to the presentation of evidence by the taxpayer, board of review consideration of testimony by the village assessor at an executive session was contrary to the open meeting law, 66.77, since although it was permissible for the board to convene a closed session for the purpose of deliberating after a quasi-judicial hearing, the proceedings did not constitute mere deliberations but were a continuation of the quasi-judicial hearing without the presence of or notice to the objecting taxpayer. Dolphin v. Board of Review, 70 W (2d) 403, 234 NW (2d) 277.
19.81 Annotation
Under unique facts presented in which City of Milwaukee and private non-profit festival organization incorporated Open Meetings Law into contract, court construes contract to allow public enforcement of contractual provisions concerning open meetings. Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. Pleva, 155 W (2d) 704, 456 NW (2d) 359 (1990).
19.81 Annotation
Sub. (2) requires that a meeting be held in a facility which gives reasonable public access, not total access; no person may be systematically excluded or arbitrarily refused admittance. State ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd. 173 W (2d) 553, 494 NW (2d) 408 (1993).
19.81 Annotation
A regular open meeting, held subsequent to a closed meeting on another subject, does not constitute a reconvened open meeting where there was no prior open meeting on that day. 58 Atty. Gen. 41.
19.81 Annotation
Consideration of a resolution is formal action of an administrative or minor governing body and when taken in proper closed session, the resolution and result of vote must be made available for public inspection, pursuant to 19.21, absent specific showing that the public interest would be adversely affected. 60 Atty. Gen. 9.
19.81 Annotation
Joint apprenticeship committees, appointed pursuant to 4 Wis. Adm. Code, sec. Ind 85.02, are governmental bodies within the meaning of 66.77 (2) (c) and subject to the requirements of the open meeting law. 63 Atty. Gen. 363.
19.81 Annotation
Voting procedures employed by workmen's compensation and unemployment advisory councils which utilize adjournment of public meeting for purposes of having members representing employers and members representing employes or workers to separately meet in closed caucuses and to vote as a block on reconvening are contrary to 66.77 and 15.09 (4), (5). 63 Atty. Gen. 414.
19.81 Annotation
Governmental body can call closed sessions for proper purpose without giving notice to members of news media who have filed written request under 66.77 (2) (e). 63 Atty. Gen. 470.
19.81 Annotation
Meaning of communication in 66.77 (2) (e) discussed with reference to giving the public and news media members adequate notice. 63 Atty. Gen. 509.
19.81 Annotation
Posting in Governor's office of agenda of future investment board meetings is not sufficient communication under 66.77 (2) (e) to the public or the news media who have filed a written request for notice. 63 Atty. Gen. 549.
19.81 Annotation
Under 66.77 (6), a county board may not utilize unidentified paper ballot in voting to appoint county highway commissioner, but may vote by ayes and nays or show of hands at open session if some member does not require vote to be taken in such manner that the vote of each member may be ascertained and recorded. 63 Atty. Gen. 569.
19.81 Annotation
See note to 19.21, citing 63 Atty. Gen. 573.
19.81 Note
NOTE: The following annotations refer to ss. 19.81 to 19.98.
19.81 Annotation
Open meeting law is not applicable to the Wis. judicial commission. State ex rel. Lynch v. Dancey, 71 W (2d) 287, 238 NW (2d) 81.
19.81 Annotation
Discussion of this subchapter. 65 Atty. Gen. preface.
19.81 Annotation
Public notice requirements for meetings of city district school board under this subchapter and s. 120.48, 1983 stats., discussed. 66 Atty. Gen. 93.
19.81 Annotation
Volunteer fire department organized as a nonprofit corporation under 213.05 is not subject to the open meeting law. 66 Atty. Gen. 113.
19.81 Annotation
Anyone has the right to tape-record an open meeting of a governmental body provided the meeting is not thereby physically disrupted. 66 Atty. Gen. 318.
19.81 Annotation
Open meeting law does not apply to a coroner's inquest. 67 Atty. Gen. 250.
19.81 Annotation
Open meeting law does not apply where common council hears a grievance under a collective bargaining agreement. 67 Atty. Gen. 276.
19.81 Annotation
Application of open meeting law to duties of WERC discussed. 68 Atty. Gen. 171.
19.81 Annotation
Meeting of committee on reapportionment was probably held in violation of open meetings law.
71 Atty. Gen. 63.
19.81 Annotation
Foundations, building corporations and independent bodies politic and corporate are not "governmental bodies".
73 Atty. Gen. 53.
19.81 Annotation
"Quasi-governmental corporation" in (1) includes private corporations which closely resemble governmental corporations in function, effect or status.
80 Atty. Gen. 129.
19.81 Annotation
Understanding Wisconsin's open meeting law. Harvey, WBB September 1980.
19.82
19.82
Definitions. As used in this subchapter:
19.82(1)
(1) "Governmental body" means a state or local agency, board, commission, committee, council, department or public body corporate and politic created by constitution, statute, ordinance, rule or order; a governmental or quasi-governmental corporation except for the Bradley center sports and entertainment corporation; a local exposition district under
subch. II of ch. 229; any public purpose corporation, as defined in
s. 181.79 (1); a nonprofit corporation operating the Olympic ice training center under
s. 42.11 (3); or a formally constituted subunit of any of the foregoing, but excludes any such body or committee or subunit of such body which is formed for or meeting for the purpose of collective bargaining under
subch. IV or
V of ch. 111.
Effective date note
NOTE: Sub. (1) is amended eff. 7-1-97 by
1995 Wis. Act 27 to read:
Effective date text
(1) "Governmental body" means a state or local agency, board, commission, committee, council, department or public body corporate and politic created by constitution, statute, ordinance, rule or order; a governmental or quasi-governmental corporation except for the Bradley center sports and entertainment corporation; a local exposition district under subch. II of ch. 229; any public purpose corporation, as defined in s. 181.79 (1); a nonprofit corporation operating the Olympic ice training center under s. 42.11 (3); or a formally constituted subunit of any of the foregoing, but excludes any such body or committee or subunit of such body which is formed for or meeting for the purpose of collective bargaining under subch. I, IV or V of ch. 111.
19.82(2)
(2) "Meeting" means the convening of members of a governmental body for the purpose of exercising the responsibilities, authority, power or duties delegated to or vested in the body. If one-half or more of the members of a governmental body are present, the meeting is rebuttably presumed to be for the purpose of exercising the responsibilities, authority, power or duties delegated to or vested in the body. The term does not include any social or chance gathering or conference which is not intended to avoid this subchapter, any gathering of the members of a town board for the purpose specified in
s. 60.50 (6), any gathering of the commissioners of a town sanitary district for the purpose specified in s.
60.77 (5) (k) or any gathering of the members of a drainage board created under s.
88.16, 1991 stats., or under
s. 88.17, for a purpose specified in
s. 88.065 (5) (a).
19.82(3)
(3) "Open session" means a meeting which is held in a place reasonably accessible to members of the public and open to all citizens at all times. In the case of a state governmental body, it means a meeting which is held in a building and room thereof which enables access by persons with functional limitations, as defined in
s. 101.13 (1).
19.82 Annotation
"Meeting" under (2) was found although governmental body was not empowered to exercise final powers of its parent body. State v. Swanson, 92 W (2d) 310, 284 NW (2d) 655 (1979).
