976.05(11)
(11) All courts, departments, agencies, officers and employes of this state and its political subdivisions are hereby directed to enforce the agreement on detainers and to cooperate with one another and with other parties in enforcing the agreement and effectuating its purpose.
976.05(12)
(12) Nothing in this section or in the agreement on detainers shall be construed to require the application of
s. 939.62 to any person on account of any conviction had in a proceeding brought to final disposition by reason of the use of said agreement.
976.05(13)
(13) Any prisoner who while in another state as a result of the application of the agreement on detainers escapes from lawful custody shall be punished as though such escape had occurred within this state.
976.05(14)
(14) The department shall give over the person of any inmate of any penal or correctional institution under its jurisdiction whenever so required by the operation of the agreement on detainers. The central administrator of and information agent for the agreement on detainers shall be the secretary of corrections.
976.05(15)
(15) Copies of this section shall, upon its approval, be transmitted to the governor of each state, the attorney general and the secretary of state of the United States, and the council of state governments.
976.05 Annotation
See note to Art. I, sec. 8, citing State ex rel. Garner v. Gray, 55 W (2d) 574, 201 NW (2d) 163.
976.05 Annotation
The question of whether another state which has filed a detainer has failed to grant the prisoner a speedy trial after demand must be decided by the demanding state. The appropriate officer to file a detainer under Art. IV (a) is the prosecuting officer of the county of the foreign state where the charges exist. State ex rel. Garner v. Gray, 59 W (2d) 323, 208 NW (2d) 161.
976.05 Annotation
Res judicata should not be applied to bar multiple detainer requests where prior requests were dismissed because of the inadequacy or insufficiency of the requesting documents. In Matter of Custody of Aiello, 166 W (2d) 27, 479 NW (2d) 178 (Ct. App. 1991).
976.05 Annotation
A waiver of the time limits under this section may be made by conduct and does not require an express personal waiver. State v. Aukes, 192 W (2d) 338, 531 NW (2d) 382 (Ct. App. 1995).
976.05 Annotation
Writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum issued by federal court directing state authorities to produce state prisoner for federal criminal trial is not a detainer under this section. United States v. Mauro, 436 US 340 (1978).
976.05 Annotation
Prisoner has right to pretransfer hearing. Cuyler v. Adams, 449 US 433 (1981).
976.06
976.06
Agreement on detainers; additional procedure. Following receipt of the officer's written request as provided in
s. 976.05 (4) (a), the prisoner shall forthwith be taken before a judge of a court of record of this state, who shall inform the prisoner of the request for temporary custody or availability, the crime with which charged and that the prisoner has the right to petition the governor to deny the request, to contest the request and to demand and procure legal counsel. If the prisoner or the prisoner's counsel shall state that the prisoner or the prisoner and counsel desire to test the legality of granting temporary custody or availability, the judge shall set a date for hearing which shall be not later than the expiration of the 30-day period established by
s. 976.05 (4) (a). If a hearing is set, notice of the hearing shall be given to the appropriate officer of the state requesting temporary custody or availability and to the authorities having custody of the prisoner in this state. The scope of any hearing or ruling under this section shall be confined to the request for temporary custody or availability, and to the identification of the person sought by the requesting state, but shall not encompass the guilt or innocence of the prisoner as to the crime charged by the requesting state.
976.06 History
History: 1975 c. 158,
199;
1981 c. 390.
976.06 Note
NOTE: See drafting file in Legislative Reference Bureau for Legislative Council Note to original bill. [Bill 263-A]
976.06 Annotation
State's failure to hold hearing within 30-day period required discharge of prisoner from detainer. State v. Sykes, 91 W (2d) 436, 283 NW (2d) 446 (Ct. App. 1979).
976.06 Annotation
A defendant is prohibited from raising a constitutional issue on s. 974.06 motion if the claim could have been raised in a previously filed s. 974.02 motion or a direct appeal. State v. Escalera-Naranjo, 185 W (2d) 169, 517 NW (2d) 157 (1994).
976.06 Annotation
Failure to meet the 30-day time limit requires the commencement of a new proceeding in order to obtain temporary custody over the subject of the petition. State ex rel. Kerr v. McCaughtry, 183 W (2d) 54, 515 NW (2d) 276 (Ct. App. 1994).
976.07
976.07
Agreements on extradition; Indian tribes. 976.07(1)(1) The attorney general may negotiate an agreement with any Indian tribe within the borders of this state exercising powers of self-government within the Indian country as defined in
18 USC 1151 to which this state has retroceded jurisdiction under
25 USC 1323, relating to the extradition of witnesses, fugitives and evidence found within the respective jurisdictions of this state and the tribe.
976.07(2)
(2) An agreement negotiated under
sub. (1) shall provide that a court of the sending jurisdiction, before issuing an order for the extradition of any person, shall:
976.07(2)(a)
(a) Notify the person named in the extradition warrant of the right to a hearing and to legal counsel.
976.07(2)(b)1.
1. That the person named in the warrant is the person charged with the crime or is the witness demanded.
976.07(2)(b)2.
2. That there is probable cause to believe that the person named in a criminal extradition warrant was present in the demanding jurisdiction at the time of the alleged crime or that the person committed an act in any place with intent to commit a crime in the demanding jurisdiction.
976.07(2)(c)
(c) If the person contests the legality of his or her arrest, allow a reasonable time within which the person may commence an action for habeas corpus.
976.07(3)
(3) The attorney general shall submit agreements negotiated under
sub. (1) to the governor for approval. The governor shall have 30 days in which to review the agreement. If the governor takes no action within 30 days, the agreement becomes effective.
976.07(4)
(4) The attorney general shall provide technical assistance and material support necessary to implement any agreement under this section.
976.07(5)
(5) An agreement under this section may be revoked by the governor, after consulting with the attorney general, or by the tribal chairperson upon 6 months' written notice to the other party unless a different period of time is specified in the agreement.
976.07(6)(a)
(a) Enlarge the criminal or civil jurisdiction of either the state or a tribal government under federal law.
976.07(6)(b)
(b) Permit an Indian tribe to enter into agreements other than those authorized by its organizational documents and laws.
976.07(6)(c)
(c) Permit this state or any of its political subdivisions to enter into agreements prohibited by the state constitution.
976.07 History
History: 1981 c. 368,
391.
976.08
976.08
Additional applicability. In this chapter, "prisoner" includes any person subject to an order under
s. 48.366 or
938.183 who is confined to a Wisconsin state prison and any person subject to an order under
s. 938.34 (4h) who is 17 years of age or older.
976.08 History
History: 1987 a. 27;
1995 a. 77.
