767.325(1)(b)2.b. b. Continuing the child's physical placement with the parent with whom the child resides for the greater period of time is in the best interest of the child.
767.325(1)(b)3. 3. A change in the economic circumstances or marital status of either party is not sufficient to meet the standards for modification under subd. 1.
767.325(2) (2)Modification of substantially equal physical placement orders. Notwithstanding sub. (1):
767.325(2)(a) (a) If the parties have substantially equal periods of physical placement pursuant to a court order and circumstances make it impractical for the parties to continue to have substantially equal physical placement, a court, upon petition, motion or order to show cause by a party, may modify such an order if it is in the best interest of the child.
767.325(2)(b) (b) In any case in which par. (a) does not apply and in which the parties have substantially equal periods of physical placement pursuant to a court order, a court, upon petition, motion or order to show cause of a party, may modify such an order based on the appropriate standard under sub. (1). However, under sub. (1) (b) 2., there is a rebuttable presumption that having substantially equal periods of physical placement is in the best interest of the child.
767.325(3) (3)Modification of other physical placement orders. Except as provided under subs. (1) and (2), upon petition, motion or order to show cause by a party, a court may modify an order of physical placement which does not substantially alter the amount of time a parent may spend with his or her child if the court finds that the modification is in the best interest of the child.
767.325(4) (4)Denial of physical placement. Upon petition, motion or order to show cause by a party or on its own motion, a court may deny a parent's physical placement rights at any time if it finds that the physical placement rights would endanger the child's physical, mental or emotional health.
767.325(5) (5)Reasons for modification. If either party opposes modification or termination of a legal custody or physical placement order under this section the court shall state, in writing, its reasons for the modification or termination.
767.325(6) (6)Notice. No court may enter an order for modification under this section until notice of the petition, motion or order to show cause requesting modification has been given to the child's parents, if they can be found, and to any relative or agency having custody of the child.
767.325(7) (7)Transfer to department. The court may order custody transferred to the department of health and family services only if that department agrees to accept custody.
767.325(8) (8)Petition, motion or order to show cause. A petition, motion or order to show cause under this section shall include notification of the availability of information under s. 767.081 (2).
767.325(9) (9)Applicability. Notwithstanding 1987 Wisconsin Act 355, section 73, as affected by 1987 Wisconsin Act 364, the parties may agree to the adjudication of a modification of a legal custody or physical placement order under this section in an action affecting the family that is pending on May 3, 1988.
767.325 History History: 1987 a. 355, 364; 1995 a. 27 s. 9126 (19).
767.325 Note NOTE: 1987 Wis. Act 355, which created this section, contains explanatory notes.
767.325 Annotation Sub. (1) (a) prohibits change of custody solely to correct mother's unreasonable interference with physical placement of the child with the father. Sub. (1) (a) provides a two year truce period, judicial intervention during this period must be compelling. Paternity of Stephanie R.N. 174 W (2d) 745, 488 NW (2d) 235 (1993).
767.325 Annotation Section 767.325 does not limit a court's authority to hold a hearing or enter an order during the two year "truce period" with the order effective on the conclusion of the truce period. Paternity of Bradford J.B., 181 W (2d) 304, 510 NW (2d) 775 (Ct. App. 1993).
767.325 Annotation There is no authority to order a change of custody at an unknown time in the future upon the occurrence of some stated contingency. Koeller v. Koeller, 195 W (2d) 660, 536 NW (2d) 216 (Ct. App. 1995).
767.325 Annotation Sub. (1) (b) is inapplicable in guardianship litigation between a parent and a third party guardian. Howard M. v. Jean R. 196 W (2d) 16, 539 NW (2d) 104 (Ct. App. 1995).
767.325 Annotation Neither sub. (4) nor s. 767.24 (4) (b) permits a prospective order prohibiting a parent from requesting a change of physical placement in the future. Jocius v. Jocius, 218 W (2d) 103, 580 NW (2d) 708 (Ct. App. 1998).
767.327 767.327 Moving the child's residence within or outside the state.
767.327(1)(1)Notice to other parent.
767.327(1)(a)(a) If the court grants periods of physical placement to more than one parent, it shall order a parent with legal custody of and physical placement rights to a child to provide not less than 60 days written notice to the other parent, with a copy to the court, of his or her intent to:
767.327(1)(a)1. 1. Establish his or her legal residence with the child at any location outside the state.
767.327(1)(a)2. 2. Establish his or her legal residence with the child at any location within this state that is at a distance of 150 miles or more from the other parent.
767.327(1)(a)3. 3. Remove the child from this state for more than 90 consecutive days.
767.327(1)(b) (b) The parent shall send the notice under par. (a) by certified mail. The notice shall state the parent's proposed action, including the specific date and location of the move or specific beginning and ending dates and location of the removal, and that the other parent may object within the time specified in sub. (2) (a).
767.327(2) (2)Objection; prohibition; mediation.
767.327(2)(a)(a) Within 15 days after receiving the notice under sub. (1), the other parent may send to the parent proposing the move or removal, with a copy to the court, a written notice of objection to the proposed action.
767.327(2)(b) (b) If the parent who is proposing the move or removal receives a notice of objection under par. (a) within 20 days after sending a notice under sub. (1) (a), the parent may not move with or remove the child pending resolution of the dispute, or final order of the court under sub. (3), unless the parent obtains a temporary order to do so under s. 767.23 (1) (bm).
767.327(2)(c) (c) Upon receipt of a copy of a notice of objection under par. (a), the court or family court commissioner shall promptly refer the parents for mediation or other family court counseling services under s. 767.11 and may appoint a guardian ad litem. Unless the parents agree to extend the time period, if mediation or counseling services do not resolve the dispute within 30 days after referral, the matter shall proceed under subs. (3) to (5).
767.327(3) (3)Standards for modification or prohibition if move or removal contested.
767.327(3)(a)1.1. Except as provided under par. (b), if the parent proposing the move or removal has sole legal or joint legal custody of the child and the child resides with that parent for the greater period of time, the parent objecting to the move or removal may file a petition, motion or order to show cause for modification of the legal custody or physical placement order affecting the child. The court may modify the legal custody or physical placement order if, after considering the factors under sub. (5), the court finds all of the following:
767.327(3)(a)1.a. a. The modification is in the best interest of the child.
767.327(3)(a)1.b. b. The move or removal will result in a substantial change of circumstances since the entry of the last order affecting legal custody or the last order substantially affecting physical placement.
767.327(3)(a)2. 2. With respect to subd. 1.:
767.327(3)(a)2.a. a. There is a rebuttable presumption that continuing the current allocation of decision making under a legal custody order or continuing the child's physical placement with the parent with whom the child resides for the greater period of time is in the best interest of the child. This presumption may be overcome by a showing that the move or removal is unreasonable and not in the best interest of the child.
767.327(3)(a)2.b. b. A change in the economic circumstances or marital status of either party is not sufficient to meet the standards for modification under that subdivision.
767.327(3)(a)3. 3. Under this paragraph, the burden of proof is on the parent objecting to the move or removal.
767.327(3)(b)1.1. If the parents have joint legal custody and substantially equal periods of physical placement with the child, either parent may file a petition, motion or order to show cause for modification of the legal custody or physical placement order. The court may modify an order of legal custody or physical placement if, after considering the factors under sub. (5), the court finds all of the following:
767.327(3)(b)1.a. a. Circumstances make it impractical for the parties to continue to have substantially equal periods of physical placement.
767.327(3)(b)1.b. b. The modification is in the best interest of the child.
767.327(3)(b)2. 2. Under this paragraph, the burden of proof is on the parent filing the petition, motion or order to show cause.
767.327(3)(c)1.1. If the parent proposing the move or removal has sole legal or joint legal custody of the child and the child resides with that parent for the greater period of time or the parents have substantially equal periods of physical placement with the child, as an alternative to the petition, motion or order to show cause under par. (a) or (b), the parent objecting to the move or removal may file a petition, motion or order to show cause for an order prohibiting the move or removal. The court may prohibit the move or removal if, after considering the factors under sub. (5), the court finds that the prohibition is in the best interest of the child.
767.327(3)(c)2. 2. Under this paragraph, the burden of proof is on the parent objecting to the move or removal.
767.327(4) (4)Guardian ad litem; prompt hearing. After a petition, motion or order to show cause is filed under sub. (3), the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem and hold a hearing as soon as possible.
767.327(5) (5)Factors in court's determination. In making its determination under sub. (3), the court shall consider all of the following factors:
767.327(5)(a) (a) Whether the purpose of the proposed action is reasonable.
767.327(5)(b) (b) The nature and extent of the child's relationship with the other parent and the disruption to that relationship which the proposed action may cause.
767.327(5)(c) (c) The availability of alternative arrangements to foster and continue the child's relationship with and access to the other parent.
767.327(6) (6)Notice required for other removals.
767.327(6)(a)(a) Unless the parents agree otherwise, a parent with legal custody and physical placement rights shall notify the other parent before removing the child from his or her primary residence for a period of not less than 14 days.
767.327(6)(b) (b) Notwithstanding par. (a), if notice is required under sub. (1), a parent shall comply with sub. (1).
767.327(6)(c) (c) Except as provided in par. (b), subs. (1) to (5) do not apply to a notice provided under par. (a).
767.327(7) (7)Applicability. Notwithstanding 1987 Wisconsin Act 355, section 73, as affected by 1987 Wisconsin Act 364, the parties may agree to the adjudication of a modification of a legal custody or physical placement order under this section in an action affecting the family that is pending on May 3, 1988.
767.327 History History: 1987 a. 355, 364; 1991 a. 32, 269; 1995 a. 70.
767.327 Annotation Discussion of application of (5) factors to determination of best interests of child. In re Marriage of Kerkvliet v. Kerkvliet, 166 W (2d) 930, 480 NW (2d) 823 (Ct. App. 1992).
767.327 Annotation Wisconsin's Child Removal Law. Wis. Law. June 1993.
767.329 767.329 Revisions agreed to by stipulation. If after an initial order is entered under s. 767.24, the parties agree to a modification in an order of physical placement or legal custody and file a stipulation with the court that specifies the agreed upon modification, the court shall incorporate the terms of the stipulation into a revised order of physical placement or legal custody.
767.329 History History: 1987 a. 355.
767.329 Annotation Acceptance of stipulation is not mandatory; trial court is not prohibited from examining best interests of the child. In re Paternity of S.A. 165 W (2d) 530, 478 NW (2d) 21 (Ct. App. 1991).
767.33 767.33 Annual adjustments in child support order.
767.33(1)(1) An order for child support under s. 767.23 or 767.25 may provide for an adjustment in the amount to be paid based on a change in the obligor's income, as reported on the disclosure form under s. 767.27 (2m) or as disclosed under s. 49.22 (2m) to the department or county child support agency under s. 59.53 (5). The order may specify the date on which the annual adjustment becomes effective. No adjustment may be made unless the order so provides and the party receiving payments applies for an adjustment as provided in sub. (2). An adjustment under this section may be made only once in any year.
767.33(1m) (1m)
767.33(1m)(a)(a) Except as provided in par. (b), this section applies only to an order under s. 767.23 or 767.25 in which payment is expressed as a fixed sum. It does not apply to such an order in which payment is expressed as a percentage of parental income.
767.33(1m)(b) (b) If payment is expressed in an order under s. 767.23 or 767.25 in the alternative as the greater or lesser of either a percentage of parental income or a fixed sum, this section applies only to the fixed sum alternative under the order.
767.33(2) (2) An adjustment under sub. (1) may be made only if the party receiving payments applies to the family court commissioner for the adjustment. If the order specifies the date on which the annual adjustment becomes effective, the application to the family court commissioner must be made at least 20 days before the effective date of the adjustment. The family court commissioner, upon application by the party receiving payments, shall send a notice by certified mail to the last-known address of the obligor. The notice shall be postmarked no later than 10 days after the date on which the application was filed and shall inform the obligor that an adjustment in payments will become effective on the date specified in the order or, if no date is specified in the order, 10 days after the date on which the notice is sent. The obligor may, after receipt of notice and before the effective date of the adjustment, request a hearing on the issue of whether the adjustment should take effect, in which case the adjustment shall be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the hearing. The family court commissioner shall hold a hearing requested under this subsection within 10 working days after the request. If at the hearing the obligor establishes that extraordinary circumstances beyond his or her control prevent fulfillment of the adjusted child support obligation, the family court commissioner may direct that all or part of the adjustment not take effect until the obligor is able to fulfill the adjusted obligation. If at the hearing the obligor does not establish that extraordinary circumstances beyond his or her control prevent fulfillment of the adjusted obligation, the adjustment shall take effect as of the date it would have become effective had no hearing been requested. Either party may, within 15 working days of the date of the decision by the family court commissioner under this subsection, seek review of the decision by the court with jurisdiction over the action.
767.37 767.37 Effect of judgment.
767.37(1)(1)
767.37(1)(a)(a) In any action affecting the family, if the court orders maintenance payments or other allowances for a party or children or retains jurisdiction in such matters, the written judgment shall include a provision that disobedience of the court order with respect to the same is punishable under ch. 785 by commitment to the county jail or house of correction until such judgment is complied with and the costs and expenses of the proceedings are paid or until the party committed is otherwise discharged, according to law. The written judgment in any action affecting the family shall include the social security numbers of the parties and of any child of the parties. The findings of fact and conclusions of law and the written judgment shall be drafted by the attorney for the moving party, and shall be submitted to the court and filed with the clerk of the court within 30 days after judgment is granted; but if the respondent has been represented by counsel, the findings, conclusions and judgment shall first be submitted to respondent's counsel for approval and if the family court commissioner has appeared at the trial of the action, such papers shall also be sent to the family court commissioner for approval. After any necessary approvals are obtained, the findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment shall be submitted to the court. Final stipulations of the parties may be appended to the judgment and incorporated by reference therein.
767.37(1)(c) (c) At the time of filing any judgment for an annulment, divorce or legal separation, the attorney for the moving party shall present to the clerk of court 2 true copies thereof in addition to the original judgment, and until such copies are presented the clerk may refuse to accept such judgment for filing. After the judgment is filed, the clerk shall mail a copy forthwith to each party to the action at the last-known address, and the court record shall show such mailing.
767.37(2) (2) So far as a judgment of divorce affects the marital status of the parties the court has the power to vacate or modify the judgment for sufficient cause shown, upon its own motion, or upon the application of both parties to the action, at any time within 6 months from the granting of such judgment. No such judgment shall be vacated or modified without service of notice of motion on the family court commissioner. The court may direct the family court commissioner or appoint some other attorney, to bring appropriate proceedings for the vacation of the judgment. The compensation of the family court commissioner when not on a salaried basis or other attorney for performing such services shall be at the rate of $50 per day, which shall be paid out of the county treasury upon order of the presiding judge and the certificate of the clerk of the court. If the judgment is vacated it shall restore the parties to the marital relation that existed before the granting of such judgment. If after vacation of the judgment either of the parties brings an action in this state for divorce against the other the court may order the petitioner in such action to reimburse the county the amount paid by it to the family court commissioner or other attorney in connection with such vacation proceedings. Whenever a judgment of divorce is set aside under this subsection, the court shall order the record in the action impounded without regard to s. 767.19; and thereafter neither the record nor any part of the record shall be offered or admitted into evidence in any action or proceeding except by special order of the court of jurisdiction upon good cause shown in any paternity proceedings under this chapter or by special order of any court of record upon a showing of necessity to clear title to real estate.
767.37(3) (3) When a judgment of divorce is granted it shall be effective immediately except as provided in s. 765.03 (2). Every judge who grants a judgment of divorce shall inform the parties appearing in court that the judgment is effective immediately except as provided in s. 765.03 (2).
767.37 History History: 1971 c. 220; 1975 c. 41, 199, 200; 1975 c. 401 s. 4; 1975 c. 421; 1977 c. 105; 1979 c. 32 ss. 50, 92 (4); 1979 c. 175 ss. 41, 53; 1979 c. 196; 1979 c. 257 s. 17; 1979 c. 352 ss. 23, 39; 1979 c. 355 s. 241; Stats. 1979 s. 767.37; 1997 a. 191.
767.37 Annotation Sub. (2) does not authorize vacating or modifying a judgment as to paternity of children determined in the original judgment. E.... v. E...., 57 W (2d) 436, 204 NW (2d) 503.
767.37 Annotation Sub. (2) provides no authority for reopening divorce judgment as it relates to property division. Conrad v. Conrad, 92 W (2d) 407, 284 NW (2d) 674 (1979).
767.37 Annotation Death of party within 6 months of divorce judgment did not void judgment or divest court of jurisdiction to order property division. In re Marriage of Roeder v. Roeder, 103 W (2d) 411, 308 NW (2d) 904 (Ct. App. 1981).
767.38 767.38 Judgment revoked on remarriage. When a judgment of divorce has been granted and the parties shall afterwards intermarry, the court, upon their joint application and upon satisfactory proof of such marriage, shall revoke all judgments and any orders which will not affect the right of 3rd persons and order the record impounded without regard to s. 767.19 and neither the record nor any part of the record shall be offered or admitted into evidence in any action or proceeding except by special order of the court of jurisdiction upon good cause shown in any paternity proceedings under this chapter or by special order of any court of record upon a showing of necessity to clear title to real estate.
767.38 History History: 1977 c. 105; 1979 c. 32 ss. 50, 92 (4); 1979 c. 352; Stats. 1979 s. 767.38.
767.39 767.39 Maintenance payments or other allowances pending appeal.
767.39(1)(1) In actions affecting the family pending in an appellate court, no allowance for suit money, counsel fees or disbursements in the court, nor for temporary maintenance payments to the spouse or the children during the pendency of the appeal will be made in the court.
767.39(2) (2) Allowances specified in sub. (1), if made at all, shall be made by the proper trial court upon motion made and decided after the entry of the order or judgment appealed from and prior to the return of the record to an appellate court, provided, that if the allowance is ordered before the appeal is taken the order shall be conditioned upon the taking of the appeal and shall be without effect unless and until the record is transmitted to the court of appeals.
767.39 History History: 1975 c. 94; 1977 c. 105; 1977 c. 187 s. 89; 1979 c. 32 s. 50; 1979 c. 352 s. 39; Stats. 1979 s. 767.39; Sup. Ct. Order, 146 W (2d) xiii (1988).
767.40 767.40 Contempt proceedings. All contempt orders in which confinement is imposed shall be issued by a judge.
767.40 History History: 1977 c. 323; 1979 c. 32 s. 50; Stats. 1979 s. 767.40.
767.42 767.42 Abandonment; seizure of property.
Loading...
Loading...
This is an archival version of the Wis. Stats. database for 1997. See Are the Statutes on this Website Official?