807.05 Note
Judicial Council Note, 1988: The statute is amended to reflect that stipulations entered into at telephone conferences are no less binding than those made in writing or in court. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1988]
807.05 Annotation
Where stipulation did not satisfy this section, summary judgment was improper. Wilharms v. Wilharms, 93 W (2d) 671, 287 NW (2d) 779 (1980).
807.05 Annotation
See note to 801.15, citing Oostburg Bank v. United Savings, 130 W (2d) 4, 386 NW (2d) 53 (1986).
807.05 Annotation
Oral agreement to settle action which doesn't comply with this section is unenforceable. Adelmeyer v. Wis. Elec. Power Co., 135 W (2d) 367, 400 NW (2d) 473 (Ct. App. 1986).
807.05 Annotation
Section does not affect procedural stipulations or judicial admissions which dispense with evidentiary requirements. State v. Aldazabal, 146 W (2d) 267, 430 NW (2d) 614 (Ct. App. 1988).
807.05 Annotation
Subscription requirement is met by stamped facsimile signature; provision does not require hand-written signature. Kocinski v. Home Ins. Co. 154 W (2d) 56, 452 NW (2d) 360 (1990).
807.05 Annotation
Contract law is not binding in construing, enforcing or modifying stipulations, but principles of contract law, including the uniform commercial code, may illuminate a stipulation dispute even to the point of being dispositive. Phone Partners Ltd. v. C. F. Communications, 196 W (2d) 702, 512 NW (2d) 155 (Ct. App. 1995).
807.05 Annotation
Oral settlements are not invariably unenforceable. Gliniciki v. Borden, Inc. 444 F Supp. 619.
807.06
807.06
Copy of paper may be used, when. If any original paper or pleading be lost or withheld by any person the court may authorize a copy thereof to be filed and used instead of the original.
807.06 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 W (2d) 585, 744 (1975).
807.07
807.07
Irregularities and lack of jurisdiction over the parties waived on appeal; jurisdiction exercised; transfer to proper court. 807.07(1)(1) When an appeal from any court, tribunal, officer or board is attempted to any court and return is duly made to such court, the respondent shall be deemed to have waived all objections to the regularity or sufficiency of the appeal or to the jurisdiction over the parties of the appellate court, unless the respondent moves to dismiss such appeal before taking or participating in any other proceedings in said appellate court. If it appears upon the hearing of such motion that such appeal was attempted in good faith the court may allow any defect or omission in the appeal papers to be supplied, either with or without terms, and with the same effect as if the appeal had been originally properly taken.
807.07(2)
(2) If the tribunal from which an appeal is taken had no jurisdiction of the subject matter and the court to which the appeal is taken has such jurisdiction, the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was commenced in the good faith and belief that the first named tribunal possessed jurisdiction, allow it to proceed as if originally commenced in the proper court and shall allow the pleadings and proceedings to be amended accordingly; and in all cases in every court where objection to its jurisdiction is sustained the cause shall be certified to some court having jurisdiction, provided it appears that the error arose from mistake.
807.07 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 W (2d) 744;
1975 c. 218; Sup. Ct. Order, 92 W (2d) xiii (1979).
807.07 Note
Judicial Council Committee's Note, 1979: Sub. (1) is amended to clarify that it addresses jurisdiction over the parties, and not the subject matter jurisdiction of the appellate court. Lack of subject matter jurisdiction of an appellate court cannot be waived. Sub. (1) cannot be used to cure defects concerning subject matter jurisdiction of an appellate court. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1980]
807.07 Annotation
Neither this section nor 274.11 (4), Stats. 1971, confers jurisdiction on the court to hear an appeal in a criminal case when the appeal is not timely. Scheid v. State, 60 W (2d) 575, 211 NW (2d) 458.
807.07 Annotation
Sub. (2) applies only at the trial court level; it does not confer appellate jurisdiction on the supreme court when an appeal is first mistakenly taken to the circuit court. State v. Jakubowski, 61 W (2d) 220, 212 NW (2d) 155.
807.07 Annotation
Mere retention of appellant's brief prior to making a motion to dismiss is not participation in the appeal and does not constitute a waiver of objection to jurisdiction. The holdings in White and Maas that mere retention of briefs constitutes participation in the appeal process are overruled. State v. Van Duyse, 66 W (2d) 286, 224 NW (2d) 603.
807.07 Annotation
Where claimant timely appealed adverse worker's compensation decision in good faith but erroneously captioned appeal papers, trial court abused discretion by dismissing action. Cruz v. DILHR, 81 W (2d) 442, 260 NW (2d) 692.
807.07 Annotation
Section 807.07 (1) does not apply to petitions to appeal under 808.10. First Wis. Nat. Bank of Madison v. Nicholaou, 87 W (2d) 360, 274 NW (2d) 704 (1979).
807.07 Annotation
Court of appeals erred in failing to exercise discretion under (1) to permit amendment of notice of appeal. Northridge Bank v. Community Eye Care Center, 94 W (2d) 201, 287 NW (2d) 810 (1980).
807.07 Annotation
Sub. (2) applies to actions for review under ch. 227. Shopper Advertiser v. Department of Rev. 117 W (2d) 223, 344 NW (2d) 115 (1984).
807.08
807.08
Borrowing court files regulated. The clerk shall not permit any paper filed in the clerk's office to be taken therefrom unless upon written order of a judge of the court. The clerk shall take a written receipt for all papers so taken and preserve the same until such papers are returned. Papers so taken shall be returned at once upon request of the clerk or presiding judge, and no paper shall be kept longer than 10 days.
807.08 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 W (2d) 585, 745 (1975);
1993 a. 486.
807.08 Annotation
Clerks of court may not send original records of criminal cases to public defender prior to appeal unless judge authorizes release. 69 Atty. Gen. 63.
807.09(1)(1) A circuit judge of the circuit court of any county may appoint and remove at any time, any retired or former circuit or county court judge to act, in matters referred by the judge and in conciliation matters. When a matter for conciliation is referred for such purpose, the conciliator shall have full authority to hear, determine and report findings to the court. Such conciliators may be appointed court commissioners as provided in
s. 757.68.
807.09(2)
(2) The circuit judges of such county shall make rules, not inconsistent with law, governing procedure before and pertaining to such conciliators and the county board shall fix and provide for their compensation.
807.09 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 W (2d) 585, 746 (1975);
1975 c. 218;
1977 c. 187 s.
135;
1977 c. 323 s.
16.
807.10
807.10
Settlements in behalf of minors; judgments. 807.10(1)(1) A compromise or settlement of an action or proceeding to which a minor or mentally incompetent person is a party may be made by the general guardian, if the guardian is represented by an attorney, or the guardian ad litem with the approval of the court in which such action or proceeding is pending.
807.10(2)
(2) A cause of action in favor of or against a minor or mentally incompetent person may, without the commencement of an action thereon, be settled by the general guardian, if the guardian is represented by an attorney, with the approval of the court appointing the general guardian, or by the guardian ad litem with the approval of any court of record. An order approving a settlement or compromise under this subsection and directing the consummation thereof shall have the same force and effect as a judgment of the court.
807.10(3)
(3) If the amount awarded to a minor by judgment or by an order of the court approving a compromise settlement of a claim or cause of action of the minor does not exceed $10,000 (exclusive of interest and costs and disbursements), and if there is no general guardian of the ward, the court may upon application by the guardian ad litem after judgment, or in the order approving settlement, fix and allow the expenses of the action, including attorney fees and fees of guardian ad litem, authorize the payment of the total recovery to the clerk of the court, authorize and direct the guardian ad litem upon the payment to satisfy and discharge the judgment, or to execute releases to the parties entitled thereto and enter into a stipulation dismissing the action upon its merits. The order shall also direct the clerk upon the payment to pay the costs and disbursements and expenses of the action and to dispose of the balance in one of the manners provided in
s. 880.04 (2) as selected by the court. The fee for the clerk's services for handling, depositing and disbursing funds under this subsection is prescribed in
s. 814.61 (12) (a).
807.10 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 W (2d) 585, 746 (1975);
1975 c. 218;
1981 c. 317;
1997 a. 290.
807.10 Cross-reference
Cross-reference: See s.
880.125 for provision requiring a court approving settlements to be satisfied as to the sufficiency of the guardian's bond.
807.11
807.11
Orders: rendition and entry. 807.11(1)
(1) An order is rendered when it is signed by the judge.
807.11(2)
(2) An order is entered when it is filed in the office of the clerk of court.
807.11 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 W (2d) 585, 747 (1975).
807.11 Annotation
Oral order of state court that injunction be issued was valid even though case was removed to federal court before order was signed. Heidel v. Voight, 456 F Supp. 959 (1978).
807.12
807.12
Suing by fictitious name or as unknown; partners' names unknown. 807.12(1)(1) When the name or a part of the name of any defendant, or when any proper party defendant to an action to establish or enforce, redeem from or discharge a lien or claim to property is unknown to the plaintiff, such defendant may be designated a defendant by so much of the name as is known, or by a fictitious name, or as an unknown heir, representative, owner or person as the case may require, adding such description as may reasonably indicate the person intended. But no person whose title to or interest in land appears of record or who is in actual occupancy of land shall be proceeded against as an unknown owner.
807.12(2)
(2) When the name of such defendant is ascertained the process, pleadings and all proceedings may be amended by an order directing the insertion of the true name instead of the designation employed.
807.12(3)
(3) In an action against a partnership, if the names of the partners are unknown to the plaintiff, all proceedings may be in the partnership name until the names of the partners are ascertained, whereupon the process, pleadings and all proceedings shall be amended by order directing the insertion of such names.
807.12 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 W (2d) 585, 748 (1975).
807.12 Annotation
This section does not authorize judgment against unnamed individual. Miller v. Smith, 100 W (2d) 609, 302 NW (2d) 468 (1981).
807.12 Annotation
See note to 893.02, citing Lak v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc. 100 W (2d) 641, 302 NW (2d) 483 (1981).
807.12 Annotation
See note to 893.02, citing Lavine v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity, 140 W (2d) 434, 410 NW (2d) 623 (Ct. App. 1987).
807.12 Annotation
See note to 893.57, citing Spitler v. Dean, 148 W (2d) 630, 436 NW (2d) 308 (1989).
807.13
807.13
Telephone and audiovisual proceedings. 807.13(1)(1)
Oral arguments. The court may permit any oral argument by telephone.
807.13(2)
(2) Evidentiary hearings. In civil actions and proceedings, including those under
chs. 48,
51,
55 and
880, the court may admit oral testimony communicated to the court on the record by telephone or live audiovisual means, subject to cross-examination, when:
807.13(2)(c)
(c) The proponent shows good cause to the court. Appropriate considerations are:
807.13(2)(c)1.
1. Whether any undue surprise or prejudice would result;
807.13(2)(c)2.
2. Whether the proponent has been unable, after due diligence, to procure the physical presence of the witness;
807.13(2)(c)3.
3. The convenience of the parties and the proposed witness, and the cost of producing the witness in relation to the importance of the offered testimony;
807.13(2)(c)4.
4. Whether the procedure would allow full effective cross-examination, especially where availability to counsel of documents and exhibits available to the witness would affect such cross-examination;
807.13(2)(c)5.
5. The importance of presenting the testimony of witnesses in open court, where the finder of fact may observe the demeanor of the witness, and where the solemnity of the surroundings will impress upon the witness the duty to testify truthfully;
807.13(2)(c)6.
6. Whether the quality of the communication is sufficient to understand the offered testimony;
807.13(2)(c)7.
7. Whether a physical liberty interest is at stake in the proceeding; and
807.13(2)(c)8.
8. Such other factors as the court may, in each individual case, determine to be relevant.
807.13(3)
(3) Conferences. Whenever the applicable statutes or rules so permit, or the court otherwise determines that it is practical to do so, conferences in civil actions and proceedings may be conducted by telephone.
807.13(4)
(4) Notice; reporting; stipulation; waivers; etc.; access. In any proceeding conducted by telephone under this section:
807.13(4)(a)
(a) If the proceeding is required to be reported, a court reporter shall be in simultaneous voice communication with all parties to the call, whether or not in the physical presence of any of them.
807.13(4)(b)
(b) Parties entitled to be heard shall be given prior notice of the manner and time of the proceeding. Any participant other than the reporter electing to be present with any other participant shall give reasonable notice thereof to the other participants.
807.13(4)(c)
(c) Regardless of the physical location of any party to the call, any waiver, stipulation, motion, objection, decision, order or any other action taken by the court or a party to a reported telephone hearing has the same effect as if made in open court.
807.13(4)(d)
(d) With the exception of scheduling conferences and pretrial conferences, proceedings shall be conducted in a courtroom or other place reasonably accessible to the public. Participants in the proceeding may participate by telephone from any location or may elect to be physically present with one or more of the other participants. Simultaneous access to the proceeding shall be provided to persons entitled to attend by means of a loudspeaker or, upon request to the court, by making a person party to the telephone call without charge.
807.13 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 141 W (2d) xiii (1987); Sup. Ct. Order, 158 W (2d) xvii (1990);
1991 a. 32;
1997 a. 252.
Effective date note
Judicial Council Note, 1988: This section [created] allows oral arguments to be heard, evidence to be taken, or conferences to be conducted, by telephone. Sub. (4) prescribes the basic procedure for such proceedings. [Re Order eff. 1-1-88]
Effective date note
Judicial Council Note, 1990: The change in sub. (2) (c) (intro.) from "interest of justice" to "good cause" is not intended as substantive, but merely to conform it to the language used in other statutes relating to use of telephonic procedures in judicial proceedings. SS. 967.08, 970.03 (13), 971.14 (1) (c) and (4) (b), and 971.17 (2), Stats. [Re Order eff. 1-1-91]
807.13 Annotation
Speaker-telephone testimony in civil jury trials: The next best thing to being there? 1988 WLR 293.
807.13 Annotation
Videoconference Trial Testimony. Mondschein. Wis. Law. July 1997.
807.14
807.14
Interpreters. On request of any party, the court may permit an interpreter to act in any civil proceeding other than trial by telephone or live audiovisual means.
807.14 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 141 W (2d) xiii (1987);
1997 a. 252.
807.14 Note
Judicial Council Note, 1988: This section [created] allows interpreters to serve by telephone or live audio-visual means in civil proceedings other than trials, on request of any party and approval by the court. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1988]
807.14 Annotation
Se Habla Everything: The Right to an Impartial, Qualified Interpreter. Araiza. Wis. Law. Sept. 1997.
807.15
807.15
Penalty for certain actions by prisoners. 807.15(2)
(2) In any action or special proceeding, including a petition for a common law writ of certiorari, brought by a prisoner, the court may, on its own motion or on the motion of any party, order the department of corrections to extend the prisoner's mandatory release date calculated under
s. 302.11 (1) or the prisoner's eligibility for release to extended supervision under
s. 302.113 (3) (bm) or
302.114 (3) (c) or order the sheriff to deprive the prisoner of good time under
s. 302.43 if the court finds that any of the following applies:
807.15(2)(a)
(a) The action or special proceeding was filed for a malicious purpose.
807.15(2)(b)
(b) The action or special proceeding was filed solely to harass the party against which it was filed.
807.15(2)(c)
(c) The prisoner testifies falsely or otherwise knowingly offers false evidence or provides false information to the court.
807.15(3)(a)(a) Subject to
pars. (b) and
(c), if a court orders the department of corrections to extend a prisoner's mandatory release date or eligibility for release to extended supervision or orders the sheriff to deprive the prisoner of good time under
sub. (2), the order shall specify the number of days by which the mandatory release date or eligibility for release to extended supervision is to be extended or the good time deprived.
807.15(3)(b)
(b) An order under
sub. (2) to extend a prisoner's mandatory release date or deprive a prisoner of good time may not require the prisoner to serve more days than provided for under the prisoner's sentence.
807.15(3)(c)
(c) An order under
sub. (2) to extend the eligibility for release to extended supervision of a prisoner subject to
s. 302.113 may not require the prisoner to serve more days in prison than the total length of the prisoner's bifurcated sentence.
807.15(4)
(4) This section applies to prisoners who committed an offense on or after September 1, 1998.
