767.47 History
History: 1979 c. 352;
1981 c. 20 s.
2202 (20) (m);
1981 c. 359 ss.
13,
17;
1983 a. 447;
1987 a. 413;
1989 a. 31,
122,
212;
1993 a. 395,
481;
1995 a. 27 s.
9126 (19);
1995 a. 77,
100,
275,
289,
404;
1997 a. 27,
105,
191,
252;
1999 a. 185.
767.47 Annotation
It is not necessary for an alleged father to produce evidence of who the real father is in order to sustain a verdict of non-paternity. State v. Michael J. W.
210 Wis. 2d 132,
565 N.W.2d 179 (Ct. App. 1997).
767.475
767.475
Paternity procedures. 767.475(1)(a)(a) Except as provided in
par. (b), the court may appoint a guardian ad litem for the child and shall appoint a guardian ad litem for a minor parent or minor who is alleged to be a parent in a paternity proceeding unless the minor parent or the minor alleged to be the parent is represented by an attorney.
767.475(1)(b)
(b) The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for the child if
s. 767.045 (1) (a) or
(c) applies or if the court has concern that the child's best interest is not being represented.
767.475(2m)
(2m) If there is no presumption of paternity under
s. 891.41 (1), the mother shall have sole legal custody of the child until the court orders otherwise.
767.475(3)
(3) Evidence as to the time of conception may be offered as provided in
s. 891.395.
767.475(4)
(4) Discovery shall be conducted as provided in
ch. 804, except that no discovery may be obtained later than 30 days before the trial. No discovery may solicit information relating to the sexual relations of the mother occurring at any time other than the probable time of conception.
767.475(5)
(5) The statute of limitations for commencing actions concerning paternity is as provided in
s. 893.88.
767.475(7)
(7) The court may appoint a trustee or guardian to receive and manage money paid for the support of a minor child.
767.475(8)
(8) In all other matters, paternity proceedings shall be governed by the procedures applicable to other actions affecting the family.
767.477(1)(1) At any time during the pendency of an action to establish the paternity of a child, if genetic tests show that the alleged father is not excluded and that the statistical probability of the alleged father's parentage is 99.0% or higher, on the motion of a party, the court shall make an appropriate temporary order for the payment of child support and may make a temporary order assigning responsibility for and directing the manner of payment of the child's health care expenses.
767.477(2)
(2) Before making any temporary order under
sub. (1), the court shall consider those factors that the court is required to consider when granting a final judgment on the same subject matter. If the court makes a temporary child support order that deviates from the amount of support that would be required by using the percentage standard established by the department under
s. 49.22 (9), the court shall comply with the requirements of
s. 767.25 (1n).
767.477 History
History: 1997 a. 191;
1999 a. 9.
767.48
767.48
Genetic tests in paternity actions. 767.48(1)(a)(a) The court may, and upon request of a party shall, require the child, mother, any male for whom there is probable cause to believe that he had sexual intercourse with the mother during a possible time of the child's conception, or any male witness who testifies or will testify about his sexual relations with the mother at a possible time of conception to submit to genetic tests. Probable cause of sexual intercourse during a possible time of conception may be established by a sufficient petition or affidavit of the child's mother or an alleged father, filed with the court, or after an examination under oath of a party or witness, when the court determines such an examination is necessary. The court is not required to order a person who has undergone a genetic test under
s. 49.225 to submit to another test under this paragraph unless a party requests additional tests under
sub. (2).
767.48(1)(b)
(b) The genetic tests shall be performed by an expert qualified as an examiner of genetic markers present on the cells of the specific body material to be used for the tests, appointed by the court. A report completed and certified by the court-appointed expert stating genetic test results and the statistical probability of the alleged father's paternity based upon the genetic tests is admissible as evidence without expert testimony and may be entered into the record at the trial or pretrial hearing if all of the following apply:
767.48(1)(b)1.
1. At least 10 days before the trial or pretrial hearing, the party offering the report files it with the court and notifies all other parties of that filing.
767.48(1)(b)2.
2. At least 10 days before the trial or pretrial hearing, the department or county child support agency under
s. 59.53 (5) notifies the alleged father of the results of the genetic tests and that he may object to the test results by submitting an objection in writing to the court no later than the day before the hearing.
767.48(1)(b)3.
3. The alleged father, after receiving the notice under
subd. 2., does not object to the test results in the manner provided in the notice under
subd. 2.
767.48(1m)
(1m) If genetic tests ordered under this section or
s. 49.225 show that the alleged father is not excluded and that the statistical probability of the alleged father's parentage is 99.0% or higher, the alleged father shall be rebuttably presumed to be the child's parent.
767.48(2)
(2) The court, upon request by a party, shall order that independent tests be performed by other experts qualified as examiners of genetic markers present on the cells of the specific body material to be used for the tests. Additional tests performed by other experts of the same qualifications may be ordered by the court at the request of any party.
767.48(3)
(3) In all cases, the court shall determine the number and qualifications of the experts.
767.48(4)
(4) Whenever the results of genetic tests exclude an alleged father as the father of the child, this evidence shall be conclusive evidence of nonpaternity and the court shall dismiss any paternity action with respect to that alleged father. Whenever the results of genetic tests exclude any male witness from possible paternity, the tests shall be conclusive evidence of nonpaternity of the male witness. Testimony relating to sexual intercourse or possible sexual intercourse of the mother with any person excluded as a possible father, as a result of a genetic test, is inadmissible as evidence. If any party refuses to submit to a genetic test, this fact shall be disclosed to the fact finder. Refusal to submit to a genetic test ordered by the court is a contempt of the court for failure to produce evidence under
s. 767.47 (5). If the action was brought by the child's mother but she refuses to submit herself or the child to genetic tests, the action shall be dismissed.
767.48(5)
(5) The fees and costs for genetic tests performed upon any person listed under
sub. (1) shall be paid for by the county except as follows:
767.48(5)(a)
(a) Except as provided in
par. (b), at the close of the proceeding the court may order either or both parties to reimburse the county if the court finds that they have sufficient resources to pay the costs of the genetic tests.
767.48(5)(b)
(b) If 2 or more identical series of genetic tests are performed upon the same person, regardless of whether the tests were ordered under this section or
s. 49.225 or
767.458 (2), the court shall require the person requesting the 2nd or subsequent series of tests to pay for it in advance, unless the court finds that the person is indigent.
767.48(6)
(6) Any party calling a male witness for the purpose of testifying that he had sexual intercourse with the mother at any possible time of conception shall provide all other parties with the name and address of the witness 20 days before the trial or pretrial hearing. If a male witness is produced at the hearing for the purpose stated in this subsection but the party calling the witness failed to provide the 20-day notice, the court may adjourn the proceeding for the purpose of taking a genetic test of the witness prior to hearing the testimony of the witness if the court finds that the party calling the witness acted in good faith.
767.48(7)
(7) The court shall ensure that all parties are aware of their right to request genetic tests under this section.
767.48 Annotation
Where initial blood tests excluded the alleged father and the state moved for additional tests under sub. (2), the trial court erred in denying the motion and dismissing action under sub. (4). In re Paternity of S. J. K.
132 Wis. 2d 262,
392 N.W.2d 97 (Ct. App. 1986).
767.48 Annotation
The chain of custody, or authentication, must be established prior to admission of evidence under sub. (1) (b). In re Paternity of J. S. C.
135 Wis. 2d 820,
400 N.W.2d 48 (Ct. App. 1986).
767.48 Annotation
Where the respondent failed to introduce evidence regarding the test, the trial court properly barred the respondent from attacking the test during closing argument. In re Paternity of M. J. B.
144 Wis. 2d 638,
425 N.W.2d 404 (1988).
767.48 Annotation
DNA test results are admissible when procedures meet the requirements for blood tests under sub. (1) (b). In re Paternity of J.L.K.
151 Wis. 2d 566,
445 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1989).
767.48 Annotation
Where more than one set of blood test results are presented, the sub. (1m) presumption is inapplicable where only one reached 99%. In re Paternity of J.M.K.
160 Wis. 2d 429,
465 N.W.2d 833 (Ct. App. 1991).
767.48 Annotation
Where only one potential father named by the mother is not excluded by blood tests, sub. (4) does not prevent showing that the mother on several occasions did not name him as a person with whom she had sex during the conceptual period. Paternity of Jeremy D.L.
177 Wis. 2d 551,
503 N.W.2d 275 (Ct. App. 1993).
767.48 Annotation
That sub. (1m) applies only to children born to a woman while she is married does not violate principles of equal protection. Thomas M.P. v. Kimberly J.L.
207 Wis. 2d 390,
558 N.W.2d 897 (Ct. App. 1996).
767.48 Annotation
A mere denial of intercourse where access during the conceptive period is established and no other potential fathers are identified is sufficient to rebut the presumption under sub. (1m) for purposes of preventing entry of a summary judgment of paternity. State v. Michael J. W.
210 Wis. 2d 132,
565 N.W.2d 179 (Ct. App. 1997).
767.48 Annotation
The term "statistical probability" in sub. (1m) means the probability determined by combining the results of all the different types of tests performed. State v. Michael J. W.
210 Wis. 2d 132,
565 N.W.2d 179 (Ct. App. 1997).
767.48 Annotation
From here to paternity: Using blood analysis to determine parentage. Haas. WBB July 1988.
767.50(1)(1) The trial shall be divided into 2 parts. The first part shall deal with the determination of paternity. The 2nd part shall deal with child support, legal custody, periods of physical placement and related issues. At the first part of the trial, the main issue shall be whether the alleged or presumed father is or is not the father of the mother's child, but if the child was born to the mother while she was the lawful wife of a specified man there shall first be determined, as provided in
s. 891.39, the prior issue of whether the husband was not the father of the child. The first part of the trial shall be by jury only if the defendant verbally requests a jury trial either at the initial appearance or pretrial hearing or requests a jury trial in writing prior to the pretrial hearing. The court may direct, and if requested by either party, before the introduction of any testimony in the party's behalf, shall direct the jury, in cases where there is a jury, to find a special verdict as to any of the issues specified in this section except that the court shall make all the findings enumerated in
s. 767.51 (2) to
(5) [
s. 767.51 (2) to
(4)]. If the mother is dead, becomes insane, cannot be found within the jurisdiction or fails to commence or pursue the action, the proceeding does not abate if any of the persons under
s. 767.45 (1) makes a motion to continue. The testimony of the mother taken at the pretrial hearing may in any such case be read in evidence if it is competent, relevant and material. The issues of child support, custody and visitation and related issues shall be determined by the court either immediately after the first part of the trial or at a later hearing before the court.
767.50 Note
NOTE: The bracketed language indicates the correct cross-reference. Corrective legislation is pending.
767.50(2)
(2) If a jury is requested under
sub. (1), the jury shall consist of 6 persons. No verdict is valid or received unless agreed to by at least 5 of the jurors.
767.50 History
History: 1979 c. 352 s.
10; Stats. 1979 s. 767.50;
1983 a. 27,
447;
1987 a. 27,
355,
403;
1993 a. 481.
767.50 Annotation
A preponderance of the evidence standard of proof in paternity actions meets due process requirement. Rivera v. Minnich,
483 U.S. 574 (1987).
767.51
767.51
Paternity judgment. 767.51(1)(1) A judgment or order of the court determining the existence or nonexistence of paternity is determinative for all purposes.
767.51(2)
(2) The clerk of court shall file with the state registrar, within 30 days after the entry of a judgment or order determining paternity, a report showing the names, dates and birth places of the child and the father, the social security numbers of the mother, father and child and the maiden name of the mother on a form designated by the state registrar, along with the fee set forth in
s. 69.22 (5), which the clerk of court shall collect.
767.51(3)
(3) A judgment or order determining paternity shall contain all of the following provisions:
767.51(3)(a)
(a) An adjudication of the paternity of the child.
767.51(3)(b)
(b) Orders for the legal custody of and periods of physical placement with the child, determined in accordance with
s. 767.24.
767.51(3)(c)
(c) An order requiring either or both of the parents to contribute to the support of any child of the parties who is less than 18 years old, or any child of the parties who is less than 19 years old if the child is pursuing an accredited course of instruction leading to the acquisition of a high school diploma or its equivalent, determined in accordance with
s. 767.25.
767.51(3)(d)
(d) A determination as to which parent, if eligible, shall have the right to claim the child as an exemption for federal tax purposes under
26 USC 151 (c) (1) (B), or as an exemption for state tax purposes under
s. 71.07 (8) (b).
767.51(3)(e)
(e) An order requiring the father to pay or contribute to the reasonable expenses of the mother's pregnancy and the child's birth, based on the father's ability to pay or contribute to those expenses.
767.51(3)(f)
(f) An order requiring either or both parties to pay or contribute to the costs of the guardian ad litem fees, genetic tests as provided in
s. 767.48 (5) and other costs.
767.51(3)(g)
(g) An order requiring either party to pay or contribute to the attorney fees of the other party.
767.51(4)(a)(a) Subject to
par. (b), liability for past support of the child shall be limited to support for the period after the day on which the petition in the action under
s. 767.45 is filed, unless a party shows, to the satisfaction of the court, all of the following:
767.51(4)(a)1.
1. That he or she was induced to delay commencing the action by any of the following:
767.51(4)(a)1.b.
b. Actions, promises or representations by the other party upon which the party relied.
767.51(4)(a)1.c.
c. Actions taken by the other party to evade paternity proceedings.
767.51(4)(a)2.
2. That, after the inducement ceased to operate, he or she did not unreasonably delay in commencing the action.
767.51(4)(b)
(b) In no event may liability for past support of the child be imposed for any period before the birth of the child.
767.51(6)
(6) Sections 767.24,
767.245,
767.263,
767.265,
767.267,
767.29,
767.293,
767.30,
767.305,
767.31,
767.32 and
767.325, where applicable, shall apply to a judgment or order under this section.
767.51(7)
(7) The court may order the attorney for the prevailing party to prepare findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment for the approval of the court.
767.51 History
History: 1979 c. 352;
1983 a. 27,
192,
447;
1985 a. 29;
1985 a. 315 s.
22;
1987 a. 27,
37,
355,
413;
1989 a. 212;
1991 a. 39;
1993 a. 481;
1995 a. 27 ss.
7115,
7116,
9126 (19);
1995 a. 100,
201,
279,
375,
404;
1997 a. 27,
35,
191;
1999 a. 9.
767.51 Annotation
Determining a father's support obligation by applying percentage standards is inappropriate where the children live in several households. In re Paternity of B. W. S.
131 Wis. 2d 301,
388 N.W.2d 615 (1986).
767.51 Annotation
Regardless of whether a 15 year old boy's parenthood resulted from sexual assault as defined in criminal law, the trial court could find intercourse and parenthood voluntary for purposes of child support. In re Paternity of J.L.H.
149 Wis. 2d 349,
411 N.W.2d 273 (Ct. App. 1989).
767.51 Annotation
There is no statutory authority for an order requiring the mother to repay lying-in expenses paid by medical assistance. In re Paternity of N.L.M.
166 Wis. 2d 306,
479 N.W.2d 237 (Ct. App. 1991).
767.51 Annotation
An order for payment of expert witness fees under sub. (3) is not limited to $100 by s. 814.04 (2). In re Paternity of Tiffany B.
173 Wis. 2d 864,
496 N.W.2d 711 (Ct. App. 1993).
767.51 Annotation
Sub. (4m) applies to back and future support, subject to the court's discretion. A discount in back support based on the father's assertion of paternity and lack of contact with the child was improper. Paternity of Ashleigh N.H.
178 Wis. 2d 478,
504 N.W.2d 422 (Ct. App. 1993).
767.51 Annotation
The assignment to the state of child support by AFDC recipients under s. 49.19 (5) does not prevent a trial court acting under s. 767.51 (5) from giving the father credit for amounts actually contributed for support prior to the entry of an order even though the credit results in there being no payments owing from the father from which AFDC payments can be recovered. Paternity of Cheyenne D.L.
181 Wis. 2d 868,
112 N.W.2d 522 (Ct. App. 1994).
767.51 Annotation
Money may be set aside in trust under sub. (5) during a child's minority for future support including higher education expenses which may be incurred after the child's majority. The percentage standards may be used to generate future support. Paternity of Tukker M.O.
199 Wis. 2d 186,
544 N.W.2d 417 (1996).
767.51 Annotation
Summary judgment is inappropriate when the presumptive conception period under s. 891.395 does not apply and there is no evidence establishing the period or when there is an untested male whom a reasonable fact finder could conclude had intercourse with the mother during the possible conceptive period. Paternity of Taylor R.T.
199 Wis. 2d 500,
544 N.W.2d 926 (Ct. App. 1996).
767.51 Annotation
The retroactive application of sub. (4) does not violate the constitutional prohibition of ex post facto laws. Brad Michael L. v. Lee D.
210 Wis. 2d 438,
564 N.W.2d 354 (Ct. App. 1997).
767.51 Annotation
A father's lack of knowledge of a child's existence and resulting inability to visit and provide for the child may not be considered in deviating from the percentage standards for support. Support in a paternity action must be set exclusive of any marital property law principles. Brad Michael L. v. Lee D.
210 Wis. 2d 438,
564 N.W.2d 354 (Ct. App. 1997).
767.51 Annotation
A court does not have authority to create a child support obligation directly to an adult child who has received a high school diploma at the time that person commences an action for support. Roberta Jo W. v. Leroy W.
218 Wis. 2d 225,
578 N.W.2d 185 (1998).
767.51 Annotation
Nothing in this section authorizes ordering a name change in the best interests of the child in a paternity judgement. Although s. 69.15 (1) (a) provides for changing a name according to an order in a paternity action, it does not provide authority to order a name change in a paternity action without complying with the procedural requirements for a name change under s. 786.36. Paternity of Noah J.M.
223 Wis. 2d 768,
590 N.W.2d 21 (Ct. App. 1998).
767.51 Annotation
In concluding that a deviation from the percentage standards is warranted, all 14 factors under sub. (5) need not be applied. State v. Alonzo R.
230 Wis. 2d 17,
601 N.W.2d 328 (Ct. App. 1999).
