895.045 Annotation
Wisconsin's Modified, Modified Comparative Negligence Law. Kircher. Wis. Law. Feb. 1996.
895.045 Annotation
Enforceable Exculpatory Agreements. Pendleton. Wis. Law. Nov. 1997.
895.045 Annotation
Wisconsin's Comparative Negligence Statute: Applying It to Products Liability Cases Brought under a Strict Liability Theory. Pless. Wis. Law. Aug. 1998.
895.048
895.048
Recovery by auto or motorboat owner limited. The owner of a motor vehicle or motorboat which, while being operated by the spouse or minor child of such owner, is damaged as the result of an accident involving another vehicle or boat, may not recover from the owner or operator of such other vehicle or boat for such damages, if the negligence of such spouse or minor child exceeds that of the operator of such other vehicle or boat. In the event that it is judicially determined that a spouse or minor operator of the motor vehicle or motorboat is found to be guilty of less than 50% of the causal negligence involved in an accident, then in that event the owner of the motor vehicle or motorboat involved shall be entitled to recover in accordance with the contributory negligence principles as laid down in
s. 895.045. For the purposes of recovery of damages by the owner under
s. 895.048, and for this purpose only, the negligence of the spouse or minor operator shall be imputed to the owner.
895.05
895.05
Damages in actions for libel. 895.05(1)
(1) The proprietor, publisher, editor, writer or reporter upon any newspaper published in this state shall not be liable in any civil action for libel for the publication in such newspaper of a true and fair report of any judicial, legislative or other public official proceeding authorized by law or of any public statement, speech, argument or debate in the course of such proceeding. This section shall not be construed to exempt any such proprietor, publisher, editor, writer or reporter from liability for any libelous matter contained in any headline or headings to any such report, or to libelous remarks or comments added or interpolated in any such report or made and published concerning the same, which remarks or comments were not uttered by the person libeled or spoken concerning the person libeled in the course of such proceeding by some other person.
895.05(2)
(2) Before any civil action shall be commenced on account of any libelous publication in any newspaper, magazine or periodical, the libeled person shall first give those alleged to be responsible or liable for the publication a reasonable opportunity to correct the libelous matter. Such opportunity shall be given by notice in writing specifying the article and the statements therein which are claimed to be false and defamatory and a statement of what are claimed to be the true facts. The notice may also state the sources, if any, from which the true facts may be ascertained with definiteness and certainty. The first issue published after the expiration of one week from the receipt of such notice shall be within a reasonable time for correction. To the extent that the true facts are, with reasonable diligence, ascertainable with definiteness and certainty, only a retraction shall constitute a correction; otherwise the publication of the libeled person's statement of the true facts, or so much thereof as shall not be libelous of another, scurrilous, or otherwise improper for publication, published as the libeled person's statement, shall constitute a correction within the meaning of this section. A correction, timely published, without comment, in a position and type as prominent as the alleged libel, shall constitute a defense against the recovery of any damages except actual damages, as well as being competent and material in mitigation of actual damages to the extent the correction published does so mitigate them.
895.05 History
History: 1993 a. 486.
895.05 Annotation
One who contributes a nondefamatory photograph of the plaintiff to a newspaper to accompany a defamatory article is not liable absent knowledge or control of the article. Westby v. Madison Newspapers, Inc.
81 Wis. 2d 1,
259 N.W.2d 691 (1977).
895.05 Annotation
A newscaster did not act with knowledge of falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth by broadcasting that the plaintiff had been charged with a crime when the newscaster was told by a deputy sheriff that charges would be filed. Prahl v. Brosamle,
98 Wis. 2d 130,
295 N.W.2d 768 (Ct. App. 1980).
895.05 Annotation
A contract printer had no reason to know of libel and was entitled to summary judgment. Maynard v. Port Publications, Inc.
98 Wis. 2d 555,
297 N.W.2d 500 (1980).
895.05 Annotation
Sub. (2) applies to non-media defendants, but relates only to libelous publications in print media, not broadcast media. Hucko v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.
100 Wis. 2d 372,
302 N.W.2d 68 (Ct. App. 1981).
895.05 Annotation
The trial court properly dismissed a defamation claim based on a letter by a medical director charging that a foundation conducted a sham nonprofit operation since the director established the defense of truth. Fields Foundation, Ltd. v. Christensen,
103 Wis. 2d 465,
309 N.W.2d 125 (Ct. App. 1981).
895.05 Annotation
"Public figure" is defined. Constitutional protections of the news media and an individual defamer are discussed. Denny v. Mertz,
106 Wis. 2d 636,
318 N.W.2d 141 (1982).
895.05 Annotation
A former legislator who had gained notoriety within the district while in office and who was allegedly defamed in a radio broadcast within the district, was a "public figure" for purposes of a defamation action. Lewis v. Coursolle Broadcasting,
127 Wis. 2d 105,
377 N.W.2d 166 (1985).
895.05 Annotation
A computer bulletin board is not a periodical and not subject to sub. (2). It's In the Cards, Inc. v. Fuschetto,
193 Wis. 2d 429,
535 N.W.2d 11 (Ct. App. 1995).
895.05 Annotation
If a defamation plaintiff is a public figure, there must be proof of actual malice. The deliberate choice of one interpretation of a number of possible interpretations does not create a jury issue of actual malice. The selective destruction by a defendant of materials likely to be relevant to defamation litigation allows an inference that the materials would have provided evidence of actual malice, but the inference is of little weight when uncontroverted testimony makes the malice assertion a remote possibility. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc.
210 Wis. 2d 525,
563 N.W.2d 472 (1997).
895.05 Annotation
For purposes of libel law, a "public figure" who must prove malice includes a person who by being drawn into or interjecting himself or herself into a public controversy becomes a public figure for a limited purpose because of involvement in the particular controversy, which status can be created without purposeful or voluntary conduct by the individual involved. Erdmann v. SF Broadcasting of Green Bay, Inc.
229 Wis. 2d 156,
599 N.W.2d 1 (Ct. App. 1999).
895.05 Annotation
A "public dispute" is not simply a matter of interest to the public, it must be a real dispute, the outcome of which affects the general public in an appreciable way. Essentially private concerns do not become public controversies because they attract attention; the dispute's ramifications must be felt by persons who are not direct participants. Maguire v. Journal Sentinel, Inc. 2000 WI App 4,
232 Wis. 2d 236,
605 N.W.2d 881.
895.05 Annotation
The sub. (2) notice requirement applies to only libel in print. Schultz v. Sykes, 2001 WI App 255,
248 Wis. 2d 746,
638 N.W.2d 604.
895.05 Annotation
Publishers' privileges and liabilities regarding libel are discussed. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
418 U.S. 323.
895.05 Annotation
A public figure who sues media companies for libel may inquire into the editorial processes of those responsible when proof of "actual malice" is required for recovery. Herbert v. Lando,
441 U.S. 153 (1979).
895.05 Annotation
The "public figure" principle in libel cases is discussed. Wolston v. Reader's Digest Assn., Inc.
443 U.S. 157 (1979).
895.05 Annotation
If wire service accounts of a judge's remarks are substantially accurate, a defamation suit by the judge is barred under sub. (1). Simonson v. United Press Intern., Inc.
500 F. Supp 1261 (1980).
895.05 Annotation
Defamation law of Wisconsin. Brody, 65 MLR 505 (1982).
895.05 Annotation
The "public interest or concern" test: Have we resurrected a standard that should have remained in the graveyard? 70 MLR 647 (1987).
895.052
895.052
Defamation by radio and television. The owner, licensee or operator of a visual or sound radio broadcasting station or network of stations, and the agents or employees of any such owner, licensee or operator, shall not be liable in damages for any defamatory statement published or uttered in, or as a part of, a visual or sound broadcast by a candidate for political office in those instances in which, under the acts of congress or the rules and regulations of the federal communications commission, the broadcasting station or network is prohibited from censoring the script of the broadcast.
895.055
895.055
Gaming contracts void. 895.055(1)
(1) All promises, agreements, notes, bills, bonds, or other contracts, mortgages, conveyances or other securities, where the whole or any part of the consideration of the promise, agreement, note, bill, bond, mortgage, conveyance or other security shall be for money or other valuable thing whatsoever won or lost, laid or staked, or betted at or upon any game of any kind or under any name whatsoever, or by any means, or upon any race, fight, sport or pastime, or any wager, or for the repayment of money or other thing of value, lent or advanced at the time and for the purpose, of any game, play, bet or wager, or of being laid, staked, betted or wagered thereon shall be void.
895.055(2)
(2) This section does not apply to contracts of insurance made in good faith for the security or indemnity of the party insured.
895.055(3)
(3) This section does not apply to any promise, agreement, note, bill, bond, mortgage, conveyance or other security that is permitted under
chs. 562 to
569 or under state or federal laws relating to the conduct of gaming on Indian lands.
895.055 Annotation
A Puerto Rican judgment based on a gambling debt was entitled to full faith and credit in Wisconsin. Conquistador Hotel Corp. v. Fortino,
99 Wis. 2d 16,
298 N.W.2d 236 (Ct. App. 1980).
895.056
895.056
Recovery of money wagered. 895.056(1)(a)
(a) "Property" means any money, property or thing in action.
895.056(1)(b)
(b) "Wagerer" means any person who, by playing at any game or by betting or wagering on any game, election, horse or other race, ball playing, cock fighting, fight, sport or pastime or on the issue or event thereof, or on any future contingent or unknown occurrence or result in respect to anything whatever, shall have put up, staked or deposited any property with any stakeholder or 3rd person, or shall have lost and delivered any property to any winner thereof.
895.056(2)(a)(a) A wagerer may, within 3 months after putting up, staking or depositing property with a stakeholder or 3rd person, sue for and recover the property from the stakeholder or 3rd person whether the property has been lost or won or whether it has been delivered over by the stakeholder or 3rd person to the winner.
895.056(2)(b)
(b) A wagerer may, within 6 months after any delivery by the wagerer or the stakeholder of the property put up, staked or deposited, sue for and recover the property from the winner thereof if the property has been delivered over to the winner.
895.056(3)
(3) If the wagerer does not sue for and recover the property, which was put up, staked or deposited, within the time specified under
sub. (1), any other person may, in the person's behalf and the person's name, sue for and recover the property for the use and benefit of the wagerer's family or heirs, in case of the wagerer's death. The suit may be brought against and property recovered from any of the following:
895.056(3)(a)
(a) The stakeholder or a 3rd person if the property is still held by the stakeholder or 3rd person, within 6 months after the putting up, staking or depositing of the property.
895.056(3)(b)
(b) The winner of the property, within one year from the delivery of the property to the winner.
895.056(4)
(4) This section does not apply to any property that is permitted to be played, bet or wagered under
chs. 562 to
569 or under state or federal laws relating to the conduct of gaming on Indian lands.
895.057
895.057
Action against judicial officer for loss caused by misconduct. Any judicial officer who causes to be brought in a court over which the judicial officer presides any action or proceeding upon a claim placed in the judicial officer's hands as agent or attorney for collection shall be liable in a civil action to the person against whom such action or proceeding was brought for the full amount of damages and costs recovered on such claim.
895.057 History
History: 1993 a. 486.
895.06
895.06
Recovery of divisible personalty. When personal property is divisible and owned by tenants in common and one tenant in common shall claim and hold possession of more than the tenant's share or proportion thereof his or her cotenant, after making a demand in writing, may sue for and recover the cotenant's share or the value thereof. The court may direct the jury, if necessary, in any such action to find what specific articles or what share or interest belongs to the respective parties, and the court shall enter up judgment in form for one or both of the parties against the other, according to the verdict.
895.06 History
History: 1993 a. 486.
895.10
895.10
Tobacco product agreement. 895.10(1)(a)
(a) "Adjusted for inflation" means increased in accordance with the formula for inflation adjustment set forth in exhibit C of the master settlement agreement.
895.10(1)(b)
(b) "Affiliate" means a person who directly or indirectly owns or controls, is owned or controlled by or is under common ownership or control with, another person. Solely for the purposes of this definition, "owns", "is owned" and "ownership" mean ownership of an equity interest, or the equivalent thereof, of 10% or more, and the term "person" means an individual, partnership, committee, association, corporation or any other organization or group of persons.
895.10(1)(c)
(c) "Allocable share" means allocable share as that term is defined in the master settlement agreement.
895.10(1)(d)1.1. "Cigarette" means any product that contains nicotine, is intended to be burned or heated under ordinary conditions of use, and consists of or contains any of the following:
895.10(1)(d)1.a.
a. Any roll of tobacco wrapped in paper or in any substance not containing tobacco.
895.10(1)(d)1.b.
b. Tobacco, in any form, that is functional in the product, which, because of its appearance, the type of tobacco used in the filler, or its packaging and labeling, is likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as a cigarette.
895.10(1)(d)1.c.
c. Any roll of tobacco wrapped in any substance containing tobacco which, because of its appearance, the type of tobacco used in the filler, or its packaging and labeling, is likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as a cigarette described in
subd. 1. a.
895.10(1)(d)2.
2. The term "cigarette" includes "roll-your-own" tobacco, which is tobacco that, because of its appearance, type, packaging or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes.
895.10(1)(d)3.
3. For purposes of this definition of "cigarette", 0.09 ounces of "roll-your-own" tobacco constitutes one individual "cigarette".
895.10(1)(e)
(e) "Master settlement agreement" means the settlement agreement and related documents entered into on November 23, 1998, by this state and the leading U.S. tobacco product manufacturers.
895.10(1)(f)
(f) "Qualified escrow fund" means an escrow arrangement with a federally or state chartered financial institution having no affiliation with any tobacco product manufacturer and having assets of at least $1,000,000,000, which arrangement requires that the financial institution hold the escrowed funds' principal for the benefit of releasing parties and prohibits the tobacco product manufacturer placing the funds into escrow from using, accessing or directing the use of the funds' principal except as is consistent with
sub. (2) (b) 2.
895.10(1)(g)
(g) "Released claims" means released claims as that term is defined in the master settlement agreement.
895.10(1)(h)
(h) "Releasing parties" means releasing parties as that term is defined in the master settlement agreement.
895.10(1)(i)1.1. "Tobacco product manufacturer" means an entity that after May 23, 2000, directly, and not exclusively through any affiliate:
895.10(1)(i)1.a.
a. Manufactures cigarettes anywhere, which the manufacturer intends to be sold in the United States, including cigarettes intended to be sold in the United States through an importer; except that an entity that manufactures cigarettes that it intends to be sold in the United States shall not be considered a tobacco product manufacturer under this paragraph if those cigarettes are sold in the United States exclusively through an importer that is an original participating manufacturer, as defined in the master settlement agreement, that will be responsible for the payments under the master settlement agreement with respect to those cigarettes as a result of the provisions of subsection II (mm) of the master settlement agreement and that pays the taxes specified in subsection II (z) of the master settlement agreement, and the manufacturer of those cigarettes does not market or advertise those cigarettes in the United States;
895.10(1)(i)1.b.
b. Is the first purchaser anywhere, for resale in the United States, of cigarettes manufactured anywhere that the manufacturer does not intend to be sold in the United States; or
895.10(1)(i)2.
2. "Tobacco product manufacturer" does not include an affiliate of a tobacco product manufacturer unless the affiliate itself falls within
subd. 1. a.,
b. or
c.
895.10(1)(j)
(j) "Units sold" means the number of individual cigarettes sold in this state by the applicable tobacco product manufacturer, whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary, during the year in question, as measured by the excise taxes collected by this state on containers of "roll-your-own" tobacco and on packs of cigarettes bearing the excise tax stamp of this state.
895.10(2)
(2) Requirements. Any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within this state, whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary, after May 23, 2000, shall do one of the following:
895.10(2)(a)
(a) Become a participating manufacturer, as that term is defined in section II (jj) of the master settlement agreement, and generally perform its financial obligations under the master settlement agreement; or
895.10(2)(b)1.1. Place into a qualified escrow fund by April 15 of the year following the year in question the following amounts, as those amounts are adjusted for inflation:
895.10(2)(b)2.
2. A tobacco product manufacturer that places money into escrow under
subd. 1. shall receive the interest or other appreciation on that money as earned. The money placed into escrow shall be released from escrow only under the following circumstances:
895.10(2)(b)2.a.
a. To pay a judgment or settlement on any released claim brought against that tobacco product manufacturer by this state or any releasing party located or residing in this state. Moneys shall be released from escrow under this paragraph in the order in which they were placed into escrow and only to the extent and at the time necessary to make payments required under the judgment or settlement.
895.10(2)(b)2.b.
b. To the extent that a tobacco product manufacturer establishes that the amount it was required to place into escrow in a particular year was greater than the state's allocable share of the total payments that the manufacturer would have been required to make in that year under the master settlement agreement had it been a participating manufacturer, as those payments are determined under section IX (i) (2) of the master settlement agreement and before any of the adjustments or offsets described in section IX (i) (3) of that agreement other than the inflation adjustment, the excess shall be released from escrow and revert to that tobacco product manufacturer.
895.10(2)(b)2.c.
c. To the extent not released from escrow under
subd. 2. a. or
b., money shall be released from escrow and revert to the tobacco product manufacturer twenty-five years after the date on which the money was placed into escrow.
895.10(2)(b)3.
3. Each tobacco product manufacturer that elects to place money into escrow under
subd. 1. shall annually certify to the attorney general by each April 15 that the tobacco product manufacturer is in compliance with
subds. 1. and
2. The attorney general may bring a civil action on behalf of the state against any tobacco product manufacturer that fails to place into escrow the moneys required under this subsection. Any tobacco product manufacturer that fails in any year to place into escrow the money required under
subd. 1. shall:
895.10(2)(b)3.a.
a. Be required within 15 days to place money into escrow as shall bring the tobacco product manufacturer into compliance with this subsection. The court, upon a finding of violation of this paragraph, may impose a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed 5% of the amount improperly withheld from escrow per day of the violation and in a total amount not to exceed 100% of the original amount improperly withheld from escrow.
895.10(2)(b)3.b.
b. In the case of a knowing violation, be required within 15 days to place such funds into escrow as shall bring it into compliance with this subsection. The court, upon a finding of a knowing violation of this paragraph, may impose a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed 15% of the amount improperly withheld from escrow per day of the violation and in a total amount not to exceed 300% of the original amount improperly withheld from escrow.
895.10(2)(b)3.c.
c. In the case of a second or subsequent knowing violation, be prohibited from selling cigarettes to consumers within this state directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary for a period not to exceed 2 years.
895.10(2)(b)4.
4. Each failure to make an annual deposit required under this subsection shall constitute a separate violation.