The parties in an action for an annulment, divorce, or legal separation may, subject to the approval of the court, stipulate for a division of property, for maintenance payments, for the support of children, or for legal custody and physical placement, in case a divorce or legal separation is granted or a marriage annulled.
A court may not approve a stipulation for child support or family support unless the stipulation provides for payment of child support determined in a manner consistent with s. 767.511
A court may not approve a stipulation for expressing child support or family support as a percentage of the payer's income unless all of the following apply:
The payer is not subject to any other order, in any other action, for the payment of child or family support or maintenance.
All payment obligations included in the order, other than the annual receiving and disbursing fee under s. 767.57 (1e) (a)
, are expressed as a percentage of the payer's income.
A court may not approve a stipulation for a division of property that assigns substantially all of the property to one of the parties in the action if the other party in the action is in the process of applying for medical assistance under subch. IV of ch. 49
or if the court determines that it can be reasonably anticipated that the other party in the action will apply for medical assistance under subch. IV of ch. 49
within 30 months of the stipulation.
Approval of stipulation for modifications contingent on future event. 767.34(3)(a)
In this subsection, “future event” means a life event of a party or of the child or a change in the developmental or educational needs of the child.
A court may approve a stipulation for legal custody and physical placement that includes modifications to legal custody or physical placement upon the occurrence of a specified future event that is reasonably certain to occur within 2 years of the date of the stipulation. A court may not approve a stipulation under this subsection that is based on an anticipated behavior modification of a party.
A trial court is not required to give effect to a property division agreement entered into before divorce proceedings are instituted. It should make its own determination of whether the agreement adequately provides for the parties. Ray v. Ray, 57 Wis. 2d 77
, 203 N.W.2d 724
There are two types of postnuptial agreements: 1) family settlement agreements that contemplate the continuation of the marriage; and 2) separation agreements that are made after separation or in contemplation of separation. The former are presumed binding on the parties under s. 767.255 (3) (L) [now s. 767.61 (3) (L)]. The latter are governed by s. 767.10 [now this section] and constitute a recommendation jointly made by the parties to the court regarding what the judgment should provide. Evenson v. Evenson, 228 Wis. 2d 676
, 598 N.W.2d 232
(Ct. App. 1999), 98-0803
. See also Van Boxtel v. Van Boxtel, 2001 WI 40
, 242 Wis. 2d 474
, 625 N.W.2d 284
An agreement made in contemplation of divorce, entered into after the parties agreed to the divorce, was subject to s. 767.10 [now this section], not s. 767.255 [now s. 767.61]. When a party withdrew his consent before court approval, the agreement was unenforceable. Ayres v. Ayres, 230 Wis. 2d 431
, 602 N.W.2d 132
(Ct. App. 1999), 98-3450
A trial court may refuse to incorporate a stipulation in a divorce judgment when a party repudiates his or her consent. A party is free to withdraw from a stipulation until it is incorporated in a judgment, and repudiation may render the stipulation nonexistent. Van Boxtel v. Van Boxtel, 2001 WI 40
, 242 Wis. 2d 474
, 625 N.W.2d 284
The specific language of sub. (1) controls stipulations in divorces rather than the general language of s. 807.05. All agreements entered into after a divorce is filed are stipulations subject to sub. (1) and must be approved by the court. Polakowski v. Polakowski, 2003 WI App 20
, 259 Wis. 2d 765
, 657 N.W.2d 102
A stipulation under this section is not a contract that would be binding on the parties once entered into, but is only a recommendation to the court. The court need not accept it but has a duty to decide whether that recommendation is a fair and reasonable resolution of the issues that the court wants to adopt. When a court adopts a stipulation, it does so on its own responsibility within it's discretion, and the provisions become the court's judgment. Once the court decides to do so, the right of a party to withdraw from the stipulation comes to an end. Hottenroth v. Hetsko, 2006 WI App 249
, 298 Wis. 2d 200
, 727 N.W.2d 38
Before approving a stipulation, the circuit court is not required to take evidence and make an investigation in essentially the same manner as if the stipulated matters were contested. Under the facts of this case, it was unnecessary to define the minimum requirements that must be met before a court approves a stipulation. Hottenroth v. Hetsko, 2006 WI App 249
, 298 Wis. 2d 200
, 727 N.W.2d 38
Judgment of divorce or legal separation. 767.35(1)(1)
A court shall grant a judgment of divorce or legal separation if all of the following conditions are met:
The requirements of this chapter as to residence and attendance at an educational program under s. 767.401
have been complied with.
In connection with a judgment of divorce or legal separation, the court finds that the marriage is irretrievably broken under s. 767.315 (1) (a)
or (b) 1.
, unless subd. 2.
In connection with a judgment of legal separation, the court finds that the marital relationship is broken under s. 767.315 (2)
To the extent that it has jurisdiction to do so, the court has considered and approved or made provision for legal custody and physical placement, the support of any child of the marriage entitled to support, the maintenance of either spouse, and the disposition of property.
Granting divorce or legal separation.
When a party requests a legal separation rather than a divorce, the court shall grant a judgment of legal separation unless the other party requests a divorce, in which case the court shall hear and determine which judgment shall be granted.
When divorce judgment effective.
A judgment of divorce is effective when granted. A court granting a judgment of divorce shall inform the parties appearing in court that the judgment is effective when granted but that it is unlawful under s. 765.03 (2)
for a party to marry again until 6 months after the judgment is granted. This section does not prevent application of enforceable orders prior to the divorce judgment as set forth in s. 767.333
Revocation of legal separation judgment upon reconciliation.
A judgment of legal separation shall provide that, if a reconciliation occurs at any time after the judgment, the parties may apply for a revocation of the judgment. Upon application for a revocation of the judgment, the court shall make such orders as may be just and reasonable.
Conversion of legal separation to divorce.
By stipulation of both parties, or upon motion of either party not earlier than one year after entry of a judgment of legal separation, the court shall convert the judgment to a judgment of divorce.
Vacating or modifying divorce judgment as it affects marital status.
So far as a judgment of divorce affects the marital status of the parties, the court may vacate or modify the judgment for sufficient cause shown, upon its own motion, or upon the application of both parties to the action, at any time within 6 months from the granting of the judgment. If the judgment is vacated it shall restore the parties to the marital relation that existed before the granting of the judgment. If a judgment of divorce is set aside under this subsection, the court shall order the record in the action impounded without regard to s. 767.13
. After the record is impounded, the record may not be offered or admitted in whole or in part into evidence in any action or proceeding except by special order of the court of jurisdiction upon good cause shown in any paternity proceedings under this chapter or by special order of a court of record upon a showing of necessity to clear title to real estate.
Divorce judgment revoked on remarriage of parties.
When a judgment of divorce has been granted and the parties subsequently intermarry, the court, upon their joint application and upon satisfactory proof of the marriage, shall revoke all judgments and any orders that will not affect the right of 3rd persons. If the judgment is revoked, the court shall order the record impounded without regard to s. 767.13
, and the record may not be offered or admitted, in whole or in part, into evidence in any action or proceeding except by special order of the court of jurisdiction upon good cause shown in a paternity proceeding under this chapter or by special order of a court of record upon a showing of necessity to clear title to real estate.
Sub. (2) [now sub. (6)] does not authorize vacating or modifying a finding of paternity of children determined in the original divorce judgment. E. v. E., 57 Wis. 2d 436
, 204 N.W.2d 503
Sub. (2) [now sub. (6)] provides no authority for reopening a divorce judgment as it relates to a property division. Conrad v. Conrad, 92 Wis. 2d 407
, 284 N.W.2d 674
The death of a party within 6 months of a divorce judgment did not void the judgment or divest the court of jurisdiction to order property division. Roeder v. Roeder, 103 Wis. 2d 411
, 308 N.W.2d 904
(Ct. App. 1981).
A divorce judgment did not bar a wife's action against her former husband for torts allegedly committed during the marriage. Stuart v. Stuart, 143 Wis. 2d 347
, 421 N.W.2d 505
If the requirements of sub. (2) [now sub. (5)] are met, conversion to a divorce decree is mandatory. Bartz v. Bartz, 153 Wis. 2d 756
, 452 N.W.2d 160
(Ct. App. 1989).
Copies of judgment to parties.
At the time of filing a judgment for an annulment, divorce, or legal separation, the clerk shall mail a copy of the judgment promptly to each party to the action at the last-known address, and the mailing shall be shown in the court record.
History: 2005 a. 443
; Sup. Ct. Order No. 20-07
, 2021 WI 37, filed 4-23-21, eff. 7-1-21.
Effect on transfers at death. 767.375(1)(1)
Revocation of death provisions in marital property agreement.
Unless the judgment provides otherwise, a judgment of annulment, divorce or legal separation revokes a provision in a marital property agreement under s. 766.58
that provides for any of the following:
That, upon the death of either spouse, any of either or both spouses' property, including after-acquired property, passes without probate to a designated person, trust or other entity by nontestamentary disposition.
That one or both spouses will make a particular disposition in a will or other governing instrument, as defined in s. 854.01 (2)
Revocation of revocable transfers at death.
Unless sub. (1)
applies, revocation of revocable transfers at death by a former spouse to the other former spouse, or to relatives of the other former spouse, under an instrument executed before the judgment of annulment, divorce or legal separation is governed by s. 854.15
History: 1991 a. 301
; 1997 a. 188
; 2005 a. 216
; 2005 a. 443
; Stats. 2005 s. 767.375.
Maintenance, legal custody, and support when divorce or separation denied.
If a judgment in an action for divorce or legal separation denies the divorce or legal separation, the court may make such order as the nature of the case renders just and reasonable for the legal custody of and periods of physical placement with any of the minor children, and for the maintenance of either spouse and support of the children by either spouse out of property or income. If the court orders child support under this section, the court shall determine the child support payments in a manner consistent with s. 767.511
, regardless of the fact that a judgment of divorce or legal separation has not been entered.
History: 1971 c. 220
; 1979 c. 32
; Stats. 1979 s. 767.28; 1987 a. 355
; 1993 a. 481
; 2005 a. 443
; Stats. 2005 s. 767.385.
Name of spouse.
Except as provided in s. 301.47
, the court, upon granting a divorce, shall allow either spouse, upon request, to resume a former legal surname, if any.
History: 1975 c. 94
; 1979 c. 32
; Stats. 1979 s. 767.20; 2003 a. 52
; 2005 a. 443
; Stats. 2005 s. 767.395.
Women's Names in Wisconsin: In Re Petition of Kruzel. MacDougall. WBB Aug. 1975.
CHILD CUSTODY, PLACEMENT, AND VISITATION
Educational programs and classes. 767.401(1)(1)
Programs: effects of dissolution on children; parenting skills. 767.401(1)(a)(a)
During the pendency of an action affecting the family in which a minor child is involved and in which the court determines that it is appropriate and in the best interest of the child, the court, on its own motion, may order the parties to attend a program specified by the court concerning the effects on a child of a dissolution of the marriage. If the court orders the parties to attend a program under this paragraph and there is evidence that one or both of the parties have engaged in interspousal battery, as described in s. 940.19
or 940.20 (1m)
, or domestic abuse, as defined in s. 813.12 (1) (am)
, the court may not require the parties to attend the program together or at the same time.
During the pendency of an action to determine the paternity of a child, or an action affecting the family for which the underlying action was an action to determine the paternity of a child, if the court determines that it is appropriate and in the best interest of the child, the court, on its own motion, may order either or both of the parties to attend a program specified by the court providing training in parenting or coparenting skills, or both.
A program under par. (a)
shall be educational rather than therapeutic in nature and may not exceed a total of 4 hours in length. The parties shall be responsible for the cost, if any, of attendance at the program. The court may specifically assign responsibility for payment of any cost. No facts or information obtained in the course of the program, and no report resulting from the program, is admissible in any action or proceeding.
Notwithstanding s. 767.35 (1)
, the court may require the parties to an action affecting the family in which a minor child is involved to attend a program under par. (a)
as a condition to the granting of a final judgment or order in the action affecting the family.
A party who fails to attend a program ordered under par. (a)
or pay costs specifically ordered under par. (c)
may be proceeded against under ch. 785
for contempt of court.
During the pendency of a divorce or paternity action, the court may order the parties to attend a class that is approved by the court and that addresses such issues as child development, family dynamics, how parental separation affects a child's development, and what parents can do to make raising a child in a separated situation less stressful for the child.
The court may not require the parties to attend a class under this subsection as a condition to the granting of the final judgment or order in the divorce or paternity action, however, the court may refuse to hear a custody or physical placement motion of a party who refuses to attend a class ordered under this subsection.
Except as provided in subd. 2.
, the parties shall be responsible for any cost of attending the class.
If the court finds that a party is indigent, any costs that would be the responsibility of that party shall be paid by the county.
History: 1993 a. 225
; 1997 a. 45
; 1999 a. 9
; 2001 a. 61
; 2003 a. 130
; 2005 a. 443
; Stats. 2005 s. 767.401.
Family court services. 767.405(1)(a)
“Mediation" means a cooperative process involving the parties and a mediator, the purpose of which is to help the parties, by applying communication and dispute resolution skills, define and resolve their own disagreements, with the best interest of the child as the paramount consideration.
“Mediator" means a person with special skills and training in dispute resolution.
Except as provided in par. (b)
and subject to approval by the chief judge of the judicial administrative district, the circuit judge or judges in each county shall designate a person meeting the qualifications under sub. (4)
as the director of family court services in that county.
If 2 or more contiguous counties enter into a cooperative agreement under sub. (3) (b)
, the circuit judges for the counties involved shall, subject to approval by the chief judge of the judicial administrative district, designate a person meeting the qualifications under sub. (4)
as the director of family court services for those counties.
A county or counties may designate the supervisor of the office of family court commissioner as the director under par. (a)
A director of family court services designated under sub. (1m)
shall administer a family court services office if such an office is established under sub. (3) (a)
. Regardless of whether the office is established, the director shall:
Employ staff to perform mediation and to perform any legal custody and physical placement study services authorized under sub. (14)
, arrange and monitor staff training, and assign and monitor staff case load.
Contract under sub. (3) (c)
with a person or public or private entity to perform mediation and to perform any legal custody and physical placement study services authorized under sub. (14)
Supervise and perform mediation and any legal custody and physical placement study services authorized under sub. (14)
, and evaluate the quality of the mediation or study services.
Administer and manage funding for family court services.
Mediation shall be provided in every county in this state by any of the following means:
A county may establish a family court services office to provide mediation in that county.
Two or more contiguous counties may enter into a cooperative agreement to establish one family court services office to provide mediation in those counties.
A director of family court services designated under sub. (1m)
may contract with any person or public or private entity, located in a county in which the director administers family court services or in a contiguous county, to provide mediation in the county in which the person or entity is located.
Every mediator assigned under sub. (6) (a)
shall have not less than 25 hours of mediation training or not less than 3 years of professional experience in dispute resolution. Every mediator assigned under sub. (6) (a)
shall have training on the dynamics of domestic violence and the effects of domestic violence on victims of domestic violence and on children.