66.1001(4)(e)3.
3. Any other property owner or leaseholder who has an interest in property pursuant to which the person may extract nonmetallic mineral resources, if the property owner or leaseholder requests in writing that the local governmental unit provide the property owner or leaseholder notice of the hearing described in
par. (d).
66.1001(4)(f)
(f) A political subdivision shall maintain a list of persons who submit a written request to receive notice of any proposed ordinance, described under
par. (c), that affects the allowable use of the property owned by the person. At least 30 days before the hearing described in
par. (d) is held a political subdivision shall provide written notice, including a copy of the proposed ordinance, to all such persons. The notice shall be by mail or in any reasonable form that is agreed to by the person and the political subdivision. The political subdivision may charge each person on the list who receives a notice a fee that does not exceed the approximate cost of providing the notice to the person.
66.1001(5)
(5) Applicability of a regional planning commission's plan. A regional planning commission's comprehensive plan is only advisory in its applicability to a political subdivision and a political subdivision's comprehensive plan.
66.1001(6)
(6) Comprehensive plan may take effect. Notwithstanding
sub. (4), a comprehensive plan, or an amendment of a comprehensive plan, may take effect even if a local governmental unit fails to provide the notice that is required under
sub. (4) (e) or
(f), unless the local governmental unit intentionally fails to provide the notice.
66.1001 Annotation
A municipality has the authority under s. 236.45 (2) to impose a temporary town-wide prohibition on land division while developing a comprehensive plan under this section. Wisconsin Realtors Association v. Town of West Point,
2008 WI App 40,
309 Wis. 2d 199,
747 N.W.2d 681,
06-2761.
66.1001 Annotation
The use of the word "coordination" in various statutes dealing with municipal planning does not by itself authorize towns to invoke a power of "coordination" that would impose affirmative duties upon certain municipalities that are in addition to any other obligations that are imposed under those statutes. With respect to the development of and amendment of comprehensive plans, s. 66.1001 is to be followed by the local governmental units and political subdivisions identified in that section.
OAG 3-10 66.10015
66.10015
Limitation on development regulation authority. 66.10015(1)(a)
(a) "Approval" means a permit or authorization for building, zoning, driveway, stormwater, or other activity related to land development.
66.10015(1)(b)
(b) "Existing requirements" means regulations, ordinances, rules, or other properly adopted requirements of a political subdivision that are in effect at the time the application for an approval is submitted to the political subdivision.
66.10015(1)(c)
(c) "Political subdivision" means a city, village, town, or county.
66.10015(1)(d)
(d) "Project" means a specific and identifiable land development that occurs on defined and adjacent parcels of land, which includes lands separated by roads, waterways, and easements.
66.10015(2)(a)(a) Except as provided under
par. (b) or
s. 66.0401, if a person has submitted an application for an approval, the political subdivision shall approve, deny, or conditionally approve the application solely based on existing requirements, unless the applicant and the political subdivision agree otherwise. An application is filed under this section on the date that the political subdivision receives the application.
66.10015(2)(b)
(b) If a project requires more than one approval or approvals from more than one political subdivision and the applicant identifies the full scope of the project at the time of filing the application for the first approval required for the project, the existing requirements applicable in each political subdivision at the time of filing the application for the first approval required for the project shall be applicable to all subsequent approvals required for the project, unless the applicant and the political subdivision agree otherwise.
66.10015(2)(c)
(c) An application for an approval shall expire not less than 60 days after filing if all of the following apply:
66.10015(2)(c)1.
1. The application does not comply with form and content requirements.
66.10015(2)(c)2.
2. Not more than 10 working days after filing, the political subdivision provides the applicant with written notice of the noncompliance. The notice shall specify the nature of the noncompliance and the date on which the application will expire if the noncompliance is not remedied.
66.10015(2)(c)3.
3. The applicant fails to remedy the noncompliance before the date provided in the notice.
66.10015(2)(d)
(d) This section does not prohibit a political subdivision from establishing an expiration date on an approval.
66.10015 History
History: 2013 a. 74.
66.1002
66.1002
Development moratoria. 66.1002(1)(b)
(b) "Development moratorium" means a moratorium on rezoning or approving any subdivision or other division of land by plat or certified survey map that is authorized under
ch. 236.
66.1002(1)(d)
(d) "Municipality" means any city, village, or town.
66.1002(1)(e)
(e) "Public health professional" means any of the following:
66.1002(1)(f)
(f) "Registered engineer" means an individual who satisfies the registration requirements for a professional engineer as specified in
s. 443.04
66.1002(2)
(2) Moratorium allowed. Subject to the limitations and requirements specified in this section, a municipality may enact a development moratorium ordinance if the municipality has enacted a comprehensive plan, is in the process of preparing its comprehensive plan, is in the process of preparing a significant amendment to its comprehensive plan in response to a substantial change in conditions in the municipality, or is exempt from the requirement as described in
s. 66.1001 (3m), and if at least one of the following applies:
66.1002(2)(a)
(a) The municipality's governing body adopts a resolution stating that a moratorium is needed to prevent a shortage in, or the overburdening of, public facilities located in the municipality and that such a shortage or overburdening would otherwise occur during the period in which the moratorium would be in effect, except that the governing body may not adopt such a resolution unless it obtains a written report from a registered engineer stating that in his or her opinion the possible shortage or overburdening of public facilities justifies the need for a moratorium.
66.1002(2)(b)
(b) The municipality's governing body adopts a resolution stating that a moratorium is needed to address a significant threat to the public health or safety that is presented by a proposed or anticipated activity specified under
sub. (4), except that the governing body may not adopt such a resolution unless it obtains a written report from a registered engineer or public health professional stating that in his or her opinion the proposed or anticipated activity specified under
sub. (4) presents such a significant threat to the public health or safety that the need for a moratorium is justified.
66.1002(3)(a)(a) An ordinance enacted under this section shall contain at least all of the following elements:
66.1002(3)(a)1.
1. A statement describing the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium.
66.1002(3)(a)2.
2. A statement of the specific action that the municipality intends to take to alleviate the need for the moratorium.
66.1002(3)(a)3.
3. Subject to
par. (b), the length of time during which the moratorium is to be in effect.
66.1002(3)(a)4.
4. A statement describing how and why the governing body decided on the length of time described in
subd. 3.
66.1002(3)(a)5.
5. A description of the area in which the ordinance applies.
66.1002(3)(a)6.
6. An exemption for any activity specified under
sub. (4) that would have no impact, or slight impact, on the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium.
66.1002(3)(b)1.1. A development moratorium ordinance may be in effect only for a length of time that is long enough for a municipality to address the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium but, except as provided in
subd. 2., the ordinance may not remain in effect for more than 12 months.
66.1002(3)(b)2.
2. A municipality may amend the ordinance one time to extend the moratorium for not more than 6 months if the municipality's governing body determines that such an extension is necessary to address the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium.
66.1002(3)(c)
(c) A municipality may not enact a development moratorium ordinance unless it holds at least one public hearing at which the proposed ordinance is discussed. The public hearing must be preceded by a class 1 notice under
ch. 985, the notice to be at least 30 days before the hearing. The municipality may also provide notice of the hearing by any other appropriate means. The class 1 notice shall contain at least all of the following:
66.1002(3)(c)2.
2. A summary of the proposed development moratorium ordinance, including the location where the ordinance would apply, the length of time the ordinance would be in effect, and a statement describing the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium.
66.1002(3)(c)3.
3. The name and contact information of a municipal official who may be contacted to obtain additional information about the proposed ordinance.
66.1002(3)(c)4.
4. Information relating to how, where, and when a copy of the proposed ordinance may be inspected or obtained before the hearing.
66.1002(4)
(4) Applicability. A development moratorium ordinance enacted under this section applies to any of the following that is submitted to the municipality on or after the effective date of the ordinance:
66.1002 History
History: 2011 a. 144.
66.1003
66.1003
Discontinuance of a public way. 66.1003(1)
(1) In this section, "public way" means all or any part of a road, street, slip, pier, lane or paved alley.
66.1003(2)
(2) The common council of any city, except a 1st class city, or a village or town board may discontinue all or part of a public way upon the written petition of the owners of all the frontage of the lots and lands abutting upon the public way sought to be discontinued, and of the owners of more than one-third of the frontage of the lots and lands abutting on that portion of the remainder of the public way which lies within 2,650 feet of the ends of the portion to be discontinued, or lies within so much of that 2,650 feet as is within the corporate limits of the city, village or town. The beginning and ending of an alley shall be considered to be within the block in which it is located. This subsection does not apply to a highway upon the line between 2 towns that is subject to
s. 82.21.
66.1003(3)
(3) The common council of any city, except a 1st class city, or a village or town board may discontinue all or part of an unpaved alley upon the written petition of the owners of more than 50% of the frontage of the lots and lands abutting upon the portion of the unpaved alley sought to be discontinued. The beginning and ending of an unpaved alley shall be considered to be within the block in which it is located. This subsection does not apply to a highway upon the line between 2 towns that is subject to
s. 82.21.
66.1003(4)(a)(a) Notwithstanding
subs. (2) and
(3), proceedings covered by this section may be initiated by the common council or village or town board by the introduction of a resolution declaring that since the public interest requires it, a public way or an unpaved alley is vacated and discontinued. No discontinuance of a public way under this subsection may result in a landlocked parcel of property.
66.1003(4)(b)
(b) A hearing on the passage of a resolution under
par. (a) shall be set by the common council or village or town board on a date which shall not be less than 40 days after the date on which the resolution is introduced. Notice of the hearing shall be given as provided in
sub. (8) (b), except that in addition notice of the hearing shall be served on the owners of all of the frontage of the lots and lands abutting upon the public way or unpaved alley sought to be discontinued in a manner provided for the service of summons in circuit court at least 30 days before the hearing. When service cannot be made within the city, village or town, a copy of the notice shall be mailed to the owner's last-known address at least 30 days before the hearing.
66.1003(4)(c)
(c) Except as provided in this paragraph, no discontinuance of the whole or any part of a public way may be ordered under this subsection if a written objection to the proposed discontinuance is filed with the city, village or town clerk by any of the owners abutting on the public way sought to be discontinued or by the owners of more than one-third of the frontage of the lots and lands abutting on the remainder of the public way which lies within 2,650 feet from the ends of the public way proposed to be discontinued or which lies within that portion of the 2,650 feet that is within the corporate limits of the city, village or town. If a written objection is filed, the discontinuance may be ordered only by the favorable vote of two-thirds of the members of the common council or village or town board voting on the proposed discontinuance. An owner of property abutting on a discontinued public way whose property is damaged by the discontinuance may recover damages as provided in
ch. 32. The beginning and ending of an alley shall be considered to be within the block in which it is located.
66.1003(4)(d)
(d) No discontinuance of an unpaved alley shall be ordered if a written objection to a proposed discontinuance is filed with the city, village or town clerk by the owner of one parcel of land that abuts the portion of the alley to be discontinued and if the alley provides the only access to off-street parking for the parcel of land owned by the objector.
66.1003(5)
(5) For the purpose of this section, the narrowing, widening, extending or other alteration of any road, street, lane or alley does not constitute a discontinuance of any part of the former road, street, lane or alley, including any right-of-way, which is included within the right-of-way for the new road, street, lane or alley.
66.1003(6)
(6) Whenever any of the lots or lands subject to this section is owned by the state, county, city, village or town, or by a minor or incompetent person, or the title to the lots or lands is held in trust, petitions for discontinuance or objections to discontinuance may be signed by the governor, chairperson of the board of supervisors of the county, mayor of the city, president of the village, chairperson of the town board, guardian of the minor or incompetent person, or the trustee, respectively, and the signature of any private corporation may be made by its president, secretary or other principal officer or managing agent.
66.1003(7)
(7) The city council or village or town board may by resolution discontinue any alley or any portion of an alley which has been abandoned, at any time after the expiration of 5 years from the date of the recording of the plat by which it was dedicated. Failure or neglect to work or use any alley or any portion of an alley for a period of 5 years next preceding the date of notice provided for in
sub. (8) (b) shall be considered an abandonment for the purpose of this section.
66.1003(8)(a)(a) Upon receiving a petition under
sub. (2) or
(3) or upon the introduction of a resolution under
sub. (4), the city, village, town, or county shall deliver a copy of the petition or resolution to all of the following:
66.1003(8)(a)1.
1. The secretary of transportation, if the public way or unpaved alley that is the subject of the petition or resolution is located within one-quarter mile of a state trunk highway or connecting highway.
66.1003(8)(a)2.
2. The commissioner of railroads, if there is a railroad highway crossing within the portion of the public way that is the subject of the petition or resolution.
66.1003(8)(b)
(b) Notice stating when and where the petition or resolution under this section will be acted upon and stating what public way or unpaved alley is proposed to be discontinued shall be published as a class 3 notice under
ch. 985.
66.1003(9)
(9) In proceedings under this section,
s. 840.11 shall be considered as a part of the proceedings.
66.1003(10)
(10) Notwithstanding
ss. 82.10 and
82.21, no city council or county, village, or town board may discontinue a highway when the discontinuance would deprive a landowner or a public school of all access to a highway.
66.1003 History
History: 1973 c. 189 s.
20; Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 774 (1975);
1975 c. 46;
1993 a. 184,
246,
491;
1995 a. 239;
1999 a. 150 ss.
265,
337 to
343; Stats. 1999 s. 66.1003;
2003 a. 214;
2009 a. 107,
223.
66.1003 Note
NOTE: 2003 Wis. Act 214, which affected this section, contains extensive explanatory notes.
66.1003 Cross-reference
Cross-reference: See s.
236.43 for other provisions for vacating streets.
66.1003 Annotation
The enactment of sub. (2m) [now sub. (5)] did not eliminate any vested rights of abutting property owners. Miller v. City of Wauwatosa,
87 Wis. 2d 676,
275 N.W.2d 876 (1979).
66.1003 Annotation
An abutting property owner under sub. (2) (c) [now sub. (4) (c)] at the very least must be somehow supporting or sustaining travel on the street. Voss v. City of Middleton,
162 Wis. 2d 737,
470 N.W.2d 625 (1991).
66.1003 Annotation
The plain language of this section unambiguously shows that a town has authority to proceed under sub. (3) to vacate unpaved alley segments, even when considered in conjunction with ch. 236, which provides for county vacation of platted alleys in towns. The legislature could have exempted roads and alleys that fall under ch. 236, but it did not. That omission shows that the legislature did not intend for ch. 236 to be the exclusive means of dealing with unpaved alleys in recorded plats. Smerz v. Delafield Town Board,
2011 WI App 41,
332 Wis. 2d 189,
796 N.W.2d 852,
10-1186.
66.1005
66.1005
Reversion of title. 66.1005(1)(1) When any highway or public ground acquired or held for highway purposes is discontinued, the land where the highway or public ground is located shall belong to the owner or owners of the adjoining lands. If the highway or public ground is located between the lands of different owners, it shall be annexed to the lots to which it originally belonged if that can be ascertained. If the lots to which the land originally belonged cannot be ascertained, the land shall be equally divided between the owners of the lands on each side of the highway or public ground.
66.1005(2)(a)(a) Whenever any public highway or public ground acquired or held for public purposes has been vacated or discontinued, all easements and rights incidental to the easements that belong to any county, school district, town, village, city, utility, or person that relate to any underground or overground structures, improvements, or services and all rights of entrance, maintenance, construction, and repair of the structures, improvements, or services shall continue, unless one of the following applies:
66.1005(2)(a)1.
1. The owner of the easements and incidental rights gives written consent to the discontinuance of the easements and rights as a part of the vacation or discontinuance proceedings and the vacation or discontinuance resolution, ordinance or order refers to the owner's written consent.
66.1005(2)(a)2.
2. The owner of the easements and incidental rights fails to use the easements and rights for a period of 4 years from the time that the public highway or public ground was vacated or discontinued.
66.1005(2)(b)
(b) The easements and incidental rights described in
par. (a) may be discontinued in vacation or discontinuance proceedings in any case where benefits or damages are to be assessed as provided in
par. (c), if one of the following applies:
66.1005(2)(b)1.
1. The interested parties fail to reach an agreement permitting discontinuance of the easements and incidental rights.
