808.075(4)(b)4.4. Commitment, conditional release, recommitment and discharge under s. 971.17 of a person found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. 808.075(4)(d)4.4. Revision of judgment or order for child support, maintenance payments or family support payments under s. 767.59 or 767.89. 808.075(4)(d)5.5. Order for temporary maintenance, temporary child support or for suit money, counsel fees and disbursements in the appellate court under s. 767.273. 808.075(4)(d)6.6. Property division, where the court has expressly or impliedly reserved jurisdiction, provided the court does not revise or modify its final division of property. 808.075(4)(e)(e) In a case under chs. 701 or 853 to 879, any matter, unless the appellate court directs the trial court not to act on specific issues or the trial court declines to act because the matter directly affects the issues on appeal. 808.075(4)(g)7.7. Commitment, conditional release, recommitment and discharge under s. 971.17 of a person found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. 808.075(5)(5) Notwithstanding the limitations of this section, any party may petition the appellate court for remand to the circuit court for action upon specific issues. 808.075(6)(6) In addition to sub. (5), the appellate court may remand the record to the circuit court for additional proceedings while the appeal is pending. 808.075(7)(7) Upon completion of an action taken by the circuit court under sub. (1), (4), (5) or (6) of this section, the clerk shall send a copy of the judgment or order to the appellate court. 808.075(8)(8) If an appellate court remands the record to the circuit court for additional proceedings under sub. (5) or (6), the appellate court, in the pending appeal, may review the judgment or order that the circuit court enters following remand. If any party is aggrieved by the judgment or order of the circuit court, the party shall file in the appellate court a written statement of objections to the judgment or order within 14 days after the record is returned to the clerk of the appellate court. A party that files a statement of objections need not file an additional notice of appeal or cross-appeal. 808.075 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 146 Wis. 2d xiii (1988); 1989 a. 86; 1993 a. 16, 446, 479, 481; 1995 a. 38, 73, 77, 275; 1997 a. 35, 191, 292, 296, 334; 1999 a. 9; Sup. Ct. Order No. 00-02, 2001 WI 39, 242 Wis. 2d xxvii; 2001 a. 16; 2005 a. 264, 387, 434; 2005 a. 443 ss. 263, 265; Sup. Ct. Order No. 14-03, 2016 WI 29, 368 Wis. 2d xiii; 2017 a. 365 s. 111; 2019 a. 95, 109; 2021 a. 238 ss. 44, 45; 2021 a. 240 s. 30. 808.075 NoteJudicial Council Note, 1988: In re Marriage of Hengel v. Hengel, 120 Wis. 2d 522, 355 N. W. 2d 846 (Ct. App. 1984), the court of appeals held that since there is no specific statutory exception, the trial court had no competence to enter an order requiring the husband to contribute to his wife’s attorney’s fees for representation in the trial court after a notice of appeal had been filed. Section 808.075 is created to specify the actions that may be taken in circuit court after a notice of appeal has been filed in cases appealed under s. 809.30 and after transmittal of the record to an appellate court in other cases. 808.075 NoteMatters affecting trusts and estates have historically been treated as a series of special proceedings, and the trial court is charged with ongoing supervision and administrative duties affecting such matters. Because of the ongoing involvement of the trial court, sub. (4) (e) reserves full competence to act, unless it is determined that competence should be restricted as to specific issues. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1989]
808.075 NoteJudicial Council Note, 2001: The second sentence in sub. (2) is a codification of State v. Harris, 149 Wis. 2d 943, 440 N.W.2d 364 (1989). Subsection (8) is intended to clarify procedure following a remand and to eliminate an additional notice of appeal or cross-appeal. The obligations of a person filing a statement of objections are the same as those of a cross-appellant. [Re Order No. 00-02 effective July 1, 2001] 808.075 AnnotationAn indigent in a civil case is entitled to waiver of transcript fees on appeal if the trial judge finds that the indigent has arguable reason to believe that the indigent is entitled to redress on appeal. State ex rel. Girouard v. Circuit Court, 155 Wis. 2d 148, 454 N.W.2d 792 (1990). 808.075 AnnotationUnder sub. (1) and s. 808.07 (1), a circuit court has authority to confirm a sheriff’s sale even though appeal of judgment of the foreclosure and sale is pending. Community National Bank v. O’Neill, 157 Wis. 2d 244, 458 N.W.2d 385 (Ct. App. 1990). 808.075 AnnotationWhen the court of appeals remands an appeal to the trial court for a Girouard, 155 Wis. 2d 148 (1990), determination, the court of appeals has jurisdiction to review the trial court decision without need for filing a second notice of appeal. State v. Jacobus, 167 Wis. 2d 230, 481 N.W.2d 642 (Ct. App. 1992). 808.08808.08 Further proceedings in trial court. When the record and remittitur are received in the trial court: 808.08(1)(1) If the trial judge is ordered to take specific action, the judge shall do so as soon as possible. 808.08(2)(2) If a new trial is ordered, the trial court, upon receipt of the remitted record, shall place the matter on the trial calendar. 808.08(3)(3) If action or proceedings other than those mentioned in sub. (1) or (2) is ordered, any party may, within one year after receipt of the remitted record by the clerk of the trial court, make appropriate motion for further proceedings. If further proceedings are not so initiated, the action shall be dismissed except that an extension of the one-year period may be granted, on notice, by the trial court, if the order for extension is entered during the one-year period. 808.08 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 187. 808.08 Annotation“Further proceedings” under sub. (3) and s. 801.58 (7) have the same definition. State ex rel. Ondrasek v. Circuit Court, 133 Wis. 2d 177, 394 N.W.2d 912 (Ct. App. 1986). 808.08 AnnotationA “specific action” under sub. (1) is one that requires no exercise of discretion by the trial court. “Further proceedings” under sub. (3) are those requiring the exercise of discretion by the trial court. State ex rel. J.H. Findorff & Son, Inc. v. Circuit Court, 2000 WI 30, 233 Wis. 2d 428, 608 N.W.2d 679, 97-3452. 808.08 AnnotationIn the absence of a remand order in the mandate line or some other clear directive from the appellate court ultimately deciding the appeal, a trial court whose judgment or final order has been affirmed by the appellate court on the merits has no authority to reopen the case for an amended complaint. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc., 2007 WI 97, 303 Wis. 2d 94, 735 N.W.2d 418, 04-2655. 808.09808.09 Reversal, affirmance or modification of judgment. Upon an appeal from a judgment or order an appellate court may reverse, affirm or modify the judgment or order as to any or all of the parties; may order a new trial; and, if the appeal is from a part of a judgment or order, may reverse, affirm or modify as to the part appealed from. In all cases an appellate court shall remit its judgment or decision to the court below and thereupon the court below shall proceed in accordance with the judgment or decision. 808.09 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 187. 808.09 AnnotationThe court of appeals may not direct a circuit court to enter a judgment of conviction of a lesser included offense when the jury verdict of guilty on the greater offense is reversed for insufficiency of evidence and the jury was not instructed on the lesser included offense. State v. Myers, 158 Wis. 2d 356, 461 N.W.2d 777 (1990). 808.09 AnnotationThe court of appeals has authority to grant a summary judgment motion that was denied by the trial court. State v. Courtney E., 184 Wis. 2d 592, 516 N.W.2d 422 (1994). 808.09 AnnotationIn the absence of a remand order in the mandate line or some other clear directive from the appellate court ultimately deciding the appeal, a trial court whose judgment or final order has been affirmed by the appellate court on the merits has no authority to reopen the case for an amended complaint. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc., 2007 WI 97, 303 Wis. 2d 94, 735 N.W.2d 418, 04-2655. 808.09 AnnotationUnless the supreme court explicitly states otherwise, a court of appeals opinion overruled by the supreme court no longer retains any precedential value. Blum v. 1st Auto & Casualty Insurance Co., 2010 WI 78, 326 Wis. 2d 729, 786 N.W.2d 78, 08-1324. 808.10808.10 Review by the supreme court. 808.10(1)(1) Petition for review; time limit. A decision of the court of appeals is reviewable by the supreme court only upon a petition for review granted by the supreme court. Except as provided in sub. (2) and ss. 809.32 (5) and 809.62 (1m), the petition for review shall be filed in the supreme court within 30 days of the date of the decision of the court of appeals. 808.10(2)(2) Tolling pending court of appeals reconsideration. If a motion for reconsideration is filed in the court of appeals under s. 809.24 (1) within 20 days after the date of a decision of the court of appeals, the 30-day time period to file the petition for review starts on the date the court of appeals determines the motion for reconsideration by filing an order denying the motion for reconsideration or an amended decision. 808.10 NoteJudicial Council Note, 1979: This section is amended to more properly describe the function of the supreme court in reviewing decisions of the court of appeals. The supreme court decides whether to accept jurisdiction of a case from the court of appeals after a petition to review, not a petition to appeal, is filed with the supreme court. See s. 809.62. [Bill 396-S]
/statutes/statutes/808
true
statutes
/statutes/statutes/808/075/4/f/1
Chs. 801-847, Civil Procedure
statutes/808.075(4)(f)1.
statutes/808.075(4)(f)1.
section
true
